I came back to this old thread looking for some more inforamtion about Urbanears. I can't resist replying.
I think the Urbanears Medis are treated unfair (I pick these because I own them and choose them after a long, long search for portable headphones). They just don't stand a chance of forums like this or reviewers' sites because they look fancy. They are dismissed as 'do not sound good' without further mention of why.
I disagree.
I have a pile of buds and IEM and these are the first that provide a good, open, wide sound. After all the cramped stages, finally a set of buds of this type that sets the music free. Highs are well defined and spacey, mids are strong and the bass is present and well defined. True, it's not a pumping base you can get from IEM or full size closed cans, but at least, the bass is not pumped up or hidden in the back.
Them "not sounding good" dismissal baffles me. A lot of the IEM's I spent the same or more on do truly not sound as good. To my surprise a lot of them do not come close to what they are described like in reviews here; the Sennheiser CX300II for instance should sound 'fantastic' with 'incredble' bass. I hear no bass in them. The Medis has plenty of bass.
I think Urbanears (or Zounds apparently) deserve more credit for what they accomplished in these headphones. These are open, not-in-the-ear phones. To dismiss them without any further notice as "bad sound" is just plain short-sighted.
I wish a true headphone-heads forum as this would also be open tor admit that some of the fashion phones actually sound good, but this is not even taken into consideration. If cansdo not look like medical appliances they're suspicious. Please, drop the prejudices to what looks good and has a nice package.
Lesson learned for me: do not follow the reviews on how cans sound. Take them as reference point but go for your own judgement.