channum
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Posts
- 270
- Likes
- 10
Introduction:
I got Ultimate Ears triple.fi 10 pro last month. The short version of events is that UE has been less than great with their handling of some broken super.fi 5 pro I had, so bad that I ordered Sleek SA6 to see if they would serve as an alternative to the TF10 that I have been considering returning in protest. Well, I got the SA6 and have been putting them through their paces side by side with the TF10s. Would that all my apparently difficult choices in life turn out this way in the end: this was a no-brainer, the triple.fi 10 pro are being returned.
What triple.fi 10 did better:
What both did about the same:
What SA6 did better:
The short summary is that although the superior clarity and separation in the soundstage on the TF10 made for some really amazing passages in some music, the over emphasized very high end and the over done, for my ears, very low end took away from the perfection of their sound quality. When the TF10 are great, they are very great indeed, but when they find something that reveals their flaws, they are artificial sounding and not so pleasing. Conversely, the SA6 will never be that sort of "very great", but they also have none of the over emphasis flaws that distract from the TF10. The SA6 have a more solid, more even sound quality, the same modularity that attracted me to UE products, better fit and seal, undoubtedly better customer service, and do this for around $100 less. Giving up a the potential of small gains in sound quality in some recordings compared to those positives is, for me, a no brainer.
I got Ultimate Ears triple.fi 10 pro last month. The short version of events is that UE has been less than great with their handling of some broken super.fi 5 pro I had, so bad that I ordered Sleek SA6 to see if they would serve as an alternative to the TF10 that I have been considering returning in protest. Well, I got the SA6 and have been putting them through their paces side by side with the TF10s. Would that all my apparently difficult choices in life turn out this way in the end: this was a no-brainer, the triple.fi 10 pro are being returned.
What triple.fi 10 did better:
- Soundstage - SA6 are no slouch, but TF10 is simply much more clearly defined. The virtual location of instruments with the TF10 is precise and clear.
- Tighter low end in the general - although slightly mired by an over emphasis of the very low end, the low end of the TF10 is very tight and refined, moreso than the SA6 even with the different bass ports.
- The sealed aluminum and rubber carrying case of the UE products is light years beyond the clumsy carrying case provided for the SA6.
- Quality control at ship - This is very minor, but the medium sleeves that came with the SA6 both have small tears in the silicone. The tears don't affect seal or comfort as best I can tell, but it was a small blemish on the initial impression of the SA6. I was also surprised to see that the SA6 is still not shipping with the treble tube removal tool since it was announced as finished back in May.
What both did about the same:
- Comfort - I've got no complaints with the comfort of either IEM.
- Apparent build quality - I've got my doubts about the design of UE's super.fi and triple.fi housing, but SA6 have their share of reported failures as well, so I'll just say that out of the box both appear equally well built.
- Mid range - I'm sure that there are differences, but it's splitting hairs to compare them. Both have a very clear, detailed, pleasing midrange to my ears.
- Drivability - both are easy to drive and both have high enough impedance that they don't have noise problems out of the headphone jack.
What SA6 did better:
- Fit - I had no problems with the TF10 fit in the general, but compared to the SA6, this is no contest. Getting a seal is no effort and the seal does not break no matter what facial contortions I make. This makes the SA6 a much better choice for on the go wear versus the TF10 where the seal is so easily broken by either wide facial movements (smiling, eating, opening my mouth wide) or head movements in general.
- Isolation - Since you're already too isolated with music playing with either earphone to listen to the outside world, you might as well get even better isolation, and the SA6 does a better job than the TF10.
- High end - I know that TF10 are regarded highly for their clear high end, but after listening to them a lot, I feel the high end is too emphasized. Certain instruments (acoustic guitar using electric pickup and horn sections are two common examples) veer from clear and beatiful to harsh and piercing to my ears in a number of songs. A good example is the song "Ten Little Kids" by The Jayhawks. The song has a metric ton of cymbals throughout. On the TF10, the after ring of the cymbals is forward of the vocals and distracting, on the SA6 with anything except the treble++ tube, it's as I would want it (and how all my other gear reproduces it as well).
I tested the SA6 with the treble++ and that's the closest I can come to replicate the high end of TF10. If you read the thread about the SA6, you see that most people find the treble++ not their thing, and I'm one of them. - Cord microphonics - UE's memory wire and over the ear design makes cord noise almost non-existent, but the SA6 over the ear eliminates it completely.
- The very low end - This is probably my most subjective factor, but the "subwoofer in your ear" effect of the TF10 is distracting to me. Hitting my eardrum and immediate skull bones with the same sort of punch full size loudspeakers would hit my body with is not the same thing to me. I found it distracting in hip hop and R&B. The SA6 is still plenty punchy to me and not distracting. This makes me really question why some people like the SE530 over the TF10 because it reportedly has even more bass, no thanks is all I can say.
- Unamped performance - I felt that the SA6 sound character suffered less when not amplified. I really felt the TF10 needed the amp to sound their best. While I don't mind using an amp when I'm at my desk, running around my house was a bit on the inconvenient side, and on the go was simply impractical. I suppose you can flip the lens around and point out that the SA6 don't gain as much from an amp, but from my perspective, that the difference is less significant is a point to the SA6.
The short summary is that although the superior clarity and separation in the soundstage on the TF10 made for some really amazing passages in some music, the over emphasized very high end and the over done, for my ears, very low end took away from the perfection of their sound quality. When the TF10 are great, they are very great indeed, but when they find something that reveals their flaws, they are artificial sounding and not so pleasing. Conversely, the SA6 will never be that sort of "very great", but they also have none of the over emphasis flaws that distract from the TF10. The SA6 have a more solid, more even sound quality, the same modularity that attracted me to UE products, better fit and seal, undoubtedly better customer service, and do this for around $100 less. Giving up a the potential of small gains in sound quality in some recordings compared to those positives is, for me, a no brainer.