Harun
Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Posts
- 82
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
I'm leaning more and more towards the se530's. As much as i loved the UE10's, they tend to sound a bit harsh on the ears after a while. Especially with lower quality recordings.
How is the instrument seperation and soundstage on the se530's by the way?
Originally Posted by robm321 /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is an exaggeration. The cable has never been micro phonic and I've had mine a long time. The cable has never cracked and it's bulkiness doesn't cause any problems or inconvenience to me. The extension cable is just a bonus. If it's a problem, don't use it. Why would it make a difference? The 530 has a warm sound with and awesome midrange. The highs are a bit soft for my taste but it is a great IEM. The IE8 is another option that has a lot of good reviews. I'd go with the UE11. Sounds like overall you are not impressed with the UE10s analytical sound. Why not get the E530 used, save up and then sell them when you get the UE11s? |
I'm leaning more and more towards the se530's. As much as i loved the UE10's, they tend to sound a bit harsh on the ears after a while. Especially with lower quality recordings.
How is the instrument seperation and soundstage on the se530's by the way?