UE 11 Pro Burn-In?
Oct 22, 2008 at 10:42 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 12

Midnighttown

Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Posts
50
Likes
0
well im going to recieve my UE 11 IEM's and i ask UE custom service if i need to burn in my monitors. they said that my IEM's wont need break-in any suggestion from you guys? thanks.
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 11:50 AM Post #2 of 12

dadozen

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
306
Likes
10
My guess is that IEM's need much less burn-in than full-sized headphones. But they do need some time.
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 12:52 PM Post #3 of 12

mape00

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Posts
224
Likes
11
My suggestion is to trust UE customer service and don't listen to unqualified people who might suggest X000 hours of brown noise or similar guesswork based on nonblind testing and no measurements. Many posts on a forum and/or expensive equipment doesn't make you an expert. UE - they f-ing designed the things, trust them.
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 1:09 PM Post #5 of 12

EyeAmEye

Aka: ulogin.
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Posts
2,776
Likes
10
Quote:

Originally Posted by Midnighttown /img/forum/go_quote.gif
well im going to recieve my UE 11 IEM's and i ask UE custom service if i need to burn in my monitors. they said that my IEM's wont need break-in any suggestion from you guys? thanks.



You need to burn-in your own ears more than anything else. If you are coming from any other IEM, the bump in bass on the UE11 is massive. You need to acclimate yourself to it over a few days. It will always remain huge and somewhat overblown (at least to me), but you'll get used to it.
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 7:27 PM Post #7 of 12

icebird144

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Posts
29
Likes
0
Like others have said, this is the difference between dynamic and armature drivers.
Armature drivers don't require burn in because of their design.
I think there are some thread talking about that here, but I don't have the link
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 7:38 PM Post #8 of 12

dadozen

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
306
Likes
10
btw, excellent purchase
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 8:37 PM Post #9 of 12

mrdeadfolx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Posts
2,280
Likes
12
Quote:

Originally Posted by dadozen /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My guess is that IEM's need much less burn-in than full-sized headphones. But they do need some time.


UE11's need no burn in. They use armature drivers, which do not burn in. They will sound the same out of the box as they will ten years down the line.
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 9:29 PM Post #11 of 12

mape00

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Posts
224
Likes
11
Quote:

Originally Posted by mark_h /img/forum/go_quote.gif
what 'bout the cable?


Cables do not burn in, because they have no moving parts. A robot would explain this fact with the old robot saying "DOES NOT COMPUTE". Cables and connector only get (marginally) worse with time because of oxidization and physical abuse from regular usage.

Btw I think I saw that jays put out a new headphone where the cable consisted of a single-crystal, i.e. a perfect Cu lattice with no defects whatsoever. I wonder if the difference with respect to conductivity is even measurable. Maybe it's just that it's much more durable... or maybe defects will introduced by regular usage. When I think about it it's pretty interesting, although probably only from an academic point of view.
wink.gif
 
Oct 22, 2008 at 11:51 PM Post #12 of 12

Midnighttown

Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Posts
50
Likes
0
thanks guys so ill just wait for my IEM's to arrive tomorrow lunch hope for a good fit ill keep you guys updated =D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top