aQiss
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 10
First of all, this blind test is unique, as not only mp3-encoded files are used for samples. More details below.
[size=10.5pt]I'd like to check if there are actually people with 'gold ears'; 4 audio samples of the same track, Daten-Ubertragungs-Kusschen by Dominik Eulberg, are going to help me with that.[/size]
[size=10.5pt] As I said, you are not going to face a simple mp3-vs-FLAC comparison. The test consists of 128 Kbps MP3, 256 Kbps MP3, FLAC (1406 Kbps) and, for good measure, HE-AAC (64 Kbps, iTunes VBR) encodings.[/size]
[size=10.5pt]Let's get started, shall we? The samples are uploaded to Mediafire, they are 16 bit/44100 Hz WAVs of the same size (approx. 10,3 Mbytes). Match the codec/bitrate and the sample number.[/size]
[size=10.5pt]Good luck with your guesses![/size]
Sample #1, Sample #2, Sample #3, Sample #4
--- --- --- --- ---
Hats off to everyone who tried.
The results seem to be very interesting; they made me think whether or not we really need lossless audio formats. The most cool thing is that HE-AAC (encoded with iTunes, not Nero Encoder) is a surprisingly good lossy codec which is able to provide impressive quality at ultra-low bitrates.
Sample 1 = 256 kbps CBR .mp3
Sample 2 = 64 kbps VBR .m4a (aac)
Sample 3 = 1404 kbps .flac
Sample 4 = 128 kbps CBR .mp3
[size=10.5pt]I'd like to check if there are actually people with 'gold ears'; 4 audio samples of the same track, Daten-Ubertragungs-Kusschen by Dominik Eulberg, are going to help me with that.[/size]
[size=10.5pt] As I said, you are not going to face a simple mp3-vs-FLAC comparison. The test consists of 128 Kbps MP3, 256 Kbps MP3, FLAC (1406 Kbps) and, for good measure, HE-AAC (64 Kbps, iTunes VBR) encodings.[/size]
[size=10.5pt]Let's get started, shall we? The samples are uploaded to Mediafire, they are 16 bit/44100 Hz WAVs of the same size (approx. 10,3 Mbytes). Match the codec/bitrate and the sample number.[/size]
[size=10.5pt]Good luck with your guesses![/size]
Sample #1, Sample #2, Sample #3, Sample #4
--- --- --- --- ---
Hats off to everyone who tried.
The results seem to be very interesting; they made me think whether or not we really need lossless audio formats. The most cool thing is that HE-AAC (encoded with iTunes, not Nero Encoder) is a surprisingly good lossy codec which is able to provide impressive quality at ultra-low bitrates.
Sample 1 = 256 kbps CBR .mp3
Sample 2 = 64 kbps VBR .m4a (aac)
Sample 3 = 1404 kbps .flac
Sample 4 = 128 kbps CBR .mp3