Thoughts on a bunch of DACs (and why delta-sigma kinda sucks, just to get you to think about stuff)
Jun 15, 2015 at 2:29 AM Post #5,866 of 6,500
I see, well a 2 dB change would still be transparent though. So no audible difference in DR still. I wonder if anyone's ever compared them on one of those upgradable DAC's. For the time being, I'm just gonna assume it's up to the DAC and not the chip (between these two chips at least).
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 3:20 AM Post #5,869 of 6,500
  Current measurements don't give much, if any guide to transparency. Otherwise the ODAC and O2 would be the last word in fidelity.

 
In any case, the PCM1704 would still have more DR than the PCM63 if you subtracted the A-weighting average. So unless you've directly compared the chips, these measurements aren't conclusive to its transparency, if anything else from what you're saying. So a bit confused why you started off by mentioning low level linearity.
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 3:49 AM Post #5,870 of 6,500
Have a Monarchy 22B on the way. Had a similar question about the PCM63 versus the PCM1704. Is the 63 a better sounding DAC chip, Mr. Poon said he would send me 1704s if I wanted to upgrade to 24 bits from the current 20. Good or bad idea?

Edit: Plenty of info on the 22B, but none on the upgrade (is it one?).

 

I would ask Mr. Poon which he prefer in this specific DAC and what the SQ pros and cons are. The DAC chip not only has to be good, it really has to synergy well with the filters (they work together) and also the rest of the design.

 

Regarding PCM63 versus the PCM1704, not everybody share the view of MM. AYON CD-5, NAIM CD555, Aqua Audio La Scala, Mark Levinson 30.6, Trinity DAC are some well regarding DACs that use the PCM1704 and of cause an equally list of good DACs can be made for the PCM63. 

 
Jun 15, 2015 at 9:14 AM Post #5,873 of 6,500
   
Hi,
 
Interesting. Seems really conclusive. On what dac with socketed chips did you compare them and in what ways is the 1704 a downgrade?

I had the parasound d/ac-1100, which could have been "upgraded" to the pcm1704. But based on my experience with the M7, I did not go for it. The parasound with a cheap usb/spdif converter already sounded better than the M7 to my ears.
 
But YMMV. Maybe you'll like the thicker, more syrupy sound of the 1704. 
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM Post #5,875 of 6,500
^Thanks Gents, I am going to stick with the BB PCM63s, the Monarchy 22B should be here Tuesday.

Appreciate the advice, looking forward to lighting it up!
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 11:50 AM Post #5,876 of 6,500


Kludge.

Not only are the physical parameters not interchangeable, neither are the signal parameters. The digital filter needs to be reprogrammed/replaced to be optimized to either 20 or 24 bit, as does the analog anti imaging filter.
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 11:54 AM Post #5,877 of 6,500
Kludge.

Not only are the physical parameters not interchangeable, neither are the signal parameters. The digital filter needs to be reprogrammed/replaced to be optimized to either 20 or 24 bit, as does the analog anti imaging filter.


Kludge is correct, Monarchy sells an adapter in the chip replacement and it remains at 20 bits. So I am not going to make the change, very happy I decided not to buy the other unit for sale that had been "upgraded".
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM Post #5,878 of 6,500
Kludge is correct, Monarchy sells an adapter in the chip replacement and it remains at 20 bits. So I am not going to make the change, very happy I decided not to buy the other unit for sale that had been "upgraded".


Why did you chose 22B over the NM24?
 
Jun 15, 2015 at 12:29 PM Post #5,879 of 6,500
Jun 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM Post #5,880 of 6,500
I found an M22B at a really good price, so I wanted to give it a shot. Would love to compare them head to head.

Nice. Let us know your impressions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top