jdc65
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Posts
- 79
- Likes
- 1
My thinksound Rain and Thunder IEMs arrived today. They'll need some burn-in time before I can form any definite opinions, but I'd thought I'd toss out a few unpacking photos and some comments. (My head-fi post-fu is only about yellow belt - I'll try posting some pics as attachments. If they don't come out, I'll keep trying)
thinksound does a very nice job with product packaging. I know it has nothing to do with sound, but its nice when a new toy makes a positive first impression. The cardboard packaging is minimalist but artistic, and happily uses no annoying shrink-wrap.
I had for some reason expected these to be large earbuds, but in fact they are fairly small. They are roughly the size of JVC marshmallows or RE0s, and smaller than JVC FX500s.
The cord on these is fairly long, probably too long for arm-mounted mp3 players but with plenty of room for deep pant pockets. The cord is thin and has a rubbery feeling. The attachment to the bud is pretty modest - they don't seem to be built all that strong, but time will tell if they have any durability issues. The cord is very manageable - I had no problems wearing it over ear w/out using guides. The cord is modestly microphonic - the provided shirt clip solves that, as does wear them over ear.
Isolation is average for shallow insertion IEMs. I can maintain a conversation over low volume music if I talk somewhat loudly.
I found both IEMs to be extremely comfortable. I went through my usual selection of various silicone and foam tips, but found the stock medium tips were comfortable and had the best sound quality. I'm finding these phones are very sensitive to tip style, and using the wrong tip can hurt the sound more than on my other IEMs.
How do they sound?
Both of these guys gave me the impression they needed to loosen up a bit right out of the box, so I'll only paint some broad strokes here and leave conclusions for later. I've listened to the Thunder more than the Rain, because my wife fell in love with the Rain as soon as she saw them, and spent the afternoon listening to them. She thinks they sound great, for the record.
The Thunder is, sonically, the U-shaped version of the Rain. A 'U-shaped' sound simply means that the high/treble and low/bass sounds are somewhat more emphasized. However, they both have a fundamentally similar 'house' sound. This sound is:
- somewhat subdued treble, more so (subdued) in the Rain.
- full mids
- realistic, full base in the Rain and boosted, notably strong base in the Thunder.
This leads to
- a smaller, intimate soundstage.
- tone and timbre, which to my ears sounds very correct and pleasant. I think I'm hearing the wood housing here.
- a non-fatiguing, but pretty and very smooth sound signature.
- a perception of less extreme detail than strong-treble phones.
Keep in mind, again, these impressions are right out of the box - I might hear these again in two days and change my mind on a few things. I have some more thoughts rattling around about these, but I'll do a part 2 post in a few days.
thinksound does a very nice job with product packaging. I know it has nothing to do with sound, but its nice when a new toy makes a positive first impression. The cardboard packaging is minimalist but artistic, and happily uses no annoying shrink-wrap.
I had for some reason expected these to be large earbuds, but in fact they are fairly small. They are roughly the size of JVC marshmallows or RE0s, and smaller than JVC FX500s.
The cord on these is fairly long, probably too long for arm-mounted mp3 players but with plenty of room for deep pant pockets. The cord is thin and has a rubbery feeling. The attachment to the bud is pretty modest - they don't seem to be built all that strong, but time will tell if they have any durability issues. The cord is very manageable - I had no problems wearing it over ear w/out using guides. The cord is modestly microphonic - the provided shirt clip solves that, as does wear them over ear.
Isolation is average for shallow insertion IEMs. I can maintain a conversation over low volume music if I talk somewhat loudly.
I found both IEMs to be extremely comfortable. I went through my usual selection of various silicone and foam tips, but found the stock medium tips were comfortable and had the best sound quality. I'm finding these phones are very sensitive to tip style, and using the wrong tip can hurt the sound more than on my other IEMs.
How do they sound?
Both of these guys gave me the impression they needed to loosen up a bit right out of the box, so I'll only paint some broad strokes here and leave conclusions for later. I've listened to the Thunder more than the Rain, because my wife fell in love with the Rain as soon as she saw them, and spent the afternoon listening to them. She thinks they sound great, for the record.
The Thunder is, sonically, the U-shaped version of the Rain. A 'U-shaped' sound simply means that the high/treble and low/bass sounds are somewhat more emphasized. However, they both have a fundamentally similar 'house' sound. This sound is:
- somewhat subdued treble, more so (subdued) in the Rain.
- full mids
- realistic, full base in the Rain and boosted, notably strong base in the Thunder.
This leads to
- a smaller, intimate soundstage.
- tone and timbre, which to my ears sounds very correct and pleasant. I think I'm hearing the wood housing here.
- a non-fatiguing, but pretty and very smooth sound signature.
- a perception of less extreme detail than strong-treble phones.
Keep in mind, again, these impressions are right out of the box - I might hear these again in two days and change my mind on a few things. I have some more thoughts rattling around about these, but I'll do a part 2 post in a few days.