Since some of this misdirection came from me, let me try to clarify myself...
The MG Head OTL does so have a high noise floor. (I love saying does so, it's so argumentative--I picture congressmen saying "DOES SO!") This doesn't mean that the amp isn't quiet when no music is playing. Both the one I owned and Nick's are, as Nick said, dead quiet. If I'm using the term improperly I appologize but by high noise floor, I meant the noise that is apparent while music is playing. There's a certain amount of noise that is in most recordings. In some amps this noise is reduced, in some more pronounced. In the MG Head OTL it's more pronounced and does detract somewhat from classical.
The other reason I suggested the Corda over the MG Head for classical is speed. I agree that the MG Head, especially with Nick's tube selection, sounds great with a very sweet midrange and knowing Audio & Me's preference for slow melodic music that typically makes him fall asleep, it's perfect - and is, really, ideally suited for the HD600. As a substitute for getting laid, this is a really relaxing combination. The problem is that in really complex movements (think of any of the Star Wars soundtracks, Mozart's operas, etc.) the little amp just can't keep up and the soundstage gets confused. The only word I can describe this as is sluggish.
The reason I thought the Head was better suited to rock is because rolling off the extreme highs is more a blessing than a curse with most rock and because with only four or five musicians, the sluggishness of the amp doesn't matter as much. I also think a little blurring between instruments is more suited to rock as most of them use distortion to achieve a more "full" sound anyway.
I agree that for versatility, both the Corda HA-1 and Melos SHA-1 excel where the MG Head doesn't.
Sorry if I caused confusion or used inappropriate terms. Try to remember that I'm still a newbie.