Don't worry.. If this really work, there would be connector like that available on the market.. Look at how we could find Sennheiser HD600/650 earcups prorietary connectors on Aliexpress or ebay
Don't worry.. If this really work, there would be connector like that available on the market.. Look at how we could find Sennheiser HD600/650 earcups prorietary connectors on Aliexpress or ebay
Should be trivial, similar as Balanced to SE adapter. Just connect all the grounds to one common, dual L/R to a single L/R.
But it would beat the purpose of getting those earphone in the first place
In this Qudelix case is more complicated than balanced connection.. The cabling should be similar to using bi-wire cabling from amplifier to speaker.. But instead of using passive crosover inside the speaker box, with active X-over, each driver would have their own amplifier.
For example for 2 ways with active XO one channel only... (So for stereo, there will be another like this)
LPF : Low Pass Filter
HPF: High Pass Filter
Imagine the complexity on wiring IEM like this.. This could not be simplified to 3.5mm TRS nor 2.5mm TRRS.. It would need at least 4.4mm TRRRS.. If and only if the circuit could have common ground. But even so, the wiring would be totally different with balanced 4.4mm as we normally use..
Theoretically, with active XO, we have so much freedom to decide XO order (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc..) and scheme (Butterworth, Linkwitz-Riley, etc.) which could result as better driver integration/seamless or we coud use it to push driver to the limit (i.e. using 6th order 48db/octave) which is very difficult to do (if not impossible) with such a small space on IEM housing..
I'd like to see how Qudelix could achieve this and whether it would worth the effort.. Time will tell.. But I really, really hope they are succesful and the result worth the hassle
Referring to the attached screenshot, could someone explain the volume section of the app, specifically:
1. Red column on the right side (blue rectangle)
2. Different volumes (green rectangles). Why are there two values? Which one is actually relevant to hearing pressure at my ears? If for example, put the source volume at 30%, does that mean that 5K at 100% volume can get no louder than 30% equivalent of the source?
What exactly is it about the 5K that you don't like? I think it is quite a useful device that works really well for it's size and price point. Have been using it every day and have to say it has been one of the best purchases I made in the last year. It can even drive my Aeon 2 Closed Noire to decent volume via the balanced output and also works great with my SE846 and SE535 (the latter is what I usually use it with since I like how it sounds with the PEQ). Leave my phone plugged in on my nightstand and usually fall asleep listening to it. I have no issues with the quality of the device and it has held up really well. Prefer it to glass and glossy builds on phones these days that gets easily scratched up. I have no issues tossing this thing around. Are you looking for a DAP instead?
Sorry if I am misunderstanding your post/question. The Qudelix 5K seems to do all those things you mentioned. If you are asking about alternatives, I would look at the post @rkw linked to.
it seems like ParaEQ and filters are very difficult to with streaming, even with a DAP. Like you have to run a downloaded file through the OS instead of being able to just stream or YouTube videos
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.