Chupi383
100+ Head-Fier
Personally I like having a single device that works for both portable and desktop use, and carries all my settings, any EQ, etc. with it. I haven't found it to be very compromised by miniaturization at all, apart from not supporting DSD or as wide a variety of USB sample rates as some devices, and of course not having a big round volume knob.
Mic does work on USB, though the mic modes only support 44.1 or 48 kHz output rates. I'm not sure why. I'd guess something about USB bandwidth, but I have an ancient USB SoundBlaster MP3+ (note, the "MP3" in the name is just an early 00's buzzword, the device does not encode or decode MP3) that does microphone, line in, and output all up to 192 kHz, over USB 2.0. So perhaps processing limitations of the QCC5124 while still handling up to 2 Bluetooth connections and PEQ?
Mic does work on USB, though the mic modes only support 44.1 or 48 kHz output rates. I'm not sure why. I'd guess something about USB bandwidth, but I have an ancient USB SoundBlaster MP3+ (note, the "MP3" in the name is just an early 00's buzzword, the device does not encode or decode MP3) that does microphone, line in, and output all up to 192 kHz, over USB 2.0. So perhaps processing limitations of the QCC5124 while still handling up to 2 Bluetooth connections and PEQ?