The Opamp thread
Feb 2, 2010 at 7:58 PM Post #2,134 of 7,383
Ahh, sorry. Struggling to keep up with recent events etc..... yeah I've got some adapters coming with a place specifically for this. Need to check for capacitor values though. I'll go back and have a look. Good god, imagine the AD797 sounding even better
eek.gif
 
Feb 2, 2010 at 11:19 PM Post #2,135 of 7,383
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpudHarris /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Ahh, sorry. Struggling to keep up with recent events etc..... yeah I've got some adapters coming with a place specifically for this. Need to check for capacitor values though. I'll go back and have a look. Good god, imagine the AD797 sounding even better
eek.gif



This is not a mod. It's described in the data sheet. You're supposed to use a 50 pF cap, but I think 47 pF is close enough. If you have a buffer after AD797, a tweak is to connect this cap from the output of the buffer to pin 8.
 
Feb 2, 2010 at 11:53 PM Post #2,136 of 7,383
Quote:

Originally Posted by diditmyself /img/forum/go_quote.gif
This is not a mod. It's described in the data sheet. You're supposed to use a 50 pF cap, but I think 47 pF is close enough. If you have a buffer after AD797, a tweak is to connect this cap from the output of the buffer to pin 8.


Let us know what you find.
 
Feb 3, 2010 at 12:23 AM Post #2,137 of 7,383
Quote:

Originally Posted by diditmyself /img/forum/go_quote.gif
This is not a mod. It's described in the data sheet. You're supposed to use a 50 pF cap, but I think 47 pF is close enough. If you have a buffer after AD797, a tweak is to connect this cap from the output of the buffer to pin 8.


Yeah,, I printed out the 36 pages of Walt Jung Op Amp Aplications for a bit of ''toilet reading'' and picked that up. Not sure I'll bother though as I'm lovin the 797's as are.......
L3000.gif
 
Feb 3, 2010 at 2:32 AM Post #2,138 of 7,383
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpudHarris /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yeah,, I printed out the 36 pages of Walt Jung Op Amp Aplications for a bit of ''toilet reading'' and picked that up. Not sure I'll bother though as I'm lovin the 797's as are.......
L3000.gif



I have stacks of printed PDF's, audio design books...etc. I need to get a PDF reader would save quite a few trees in the long run.
 
Feb 3, 2010 at 3:42 AM Post #2,139 of 7,383
limiting the bandwidth of 797 works quite well for stabilty too, since we dont use nearly its capabilities in audio. i'm actually using some AD797 in some super regulators, so i'm poised to love it even more.
 
Feb 7, 2010 at 12:01 AM Post #2,144 of 7,383
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpudHarris /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yeah,, I printed out the 36 pages of Walt Jung Op Amp Aplications for a bit of ''toilet reading'' and picked that up. Not sure I'll bother though as I'm lovin the 797's as are.......
L3000.gif



Spud, have you tested both the 164X? Meaning single and dual channel version?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top