Quote:
BUT did everyone forget that Harbinger was standing 300 METERS MAX FROM US? With clean line of fire? Normandy lingered there quite a while so are we supposed to believe that Harby didnt try to shoot it even once? If it were some random shuttle, I wouldnt have a problem and Harbie just would not have cared, maybe. But this was a god damn Normandy and Harbinger knows bloody well what it is!
I found it kind of questionable that ANYTHING would have survived Harbinger's blast at that range, considering the beam itself would have been about as wide as a subway tunnel given the previous frames of reference for it. I mean a dreadnaught-class Reaper beam can take down an entire starship with ease. A few makos would have been utterly vaporized. Oh well. Suspension of disbelief.
That being said, I'm not sure Harbinger would be shooting at the Normandy at that point given that Shepard had made it to the Citadel and was already in dialog with the Catalyst. It's likely the Catalyst was keeping the Reapers at bay until an agreement had been reached.
Quote:
Anyway, to the TIM. Not much was changed and I still dont understand how he was able to control Andersson. Shepard I understand thanks to his Reaper/Cerberus cybernetics, but Andersson is 100% human. Anyway, I still like this scene well enough.
Heh, not to get nitpicky, but "
the TIM" is a bit redundant.
I see it this way: Anderson and Shepard were both inside the Citadel, which at that point had been "activated" and was therefore working Reaper tech. You know the effects of Reaper tech on organics. TIM isn't controlling Shepard because Shepard's Cerberus cybernetics are Reaper tech. If that were the case, he could have exercised way more control way earlier on, and he was quite clear in his not "tampering with who Shepard is" when he brings Shepard back from the dead. So yeah, Anderson can be controlled the same way Shepard can be controlled: somehow TIM is able to manipulate the indoctrination effect of the Reaper tech
, perhaps the end result of all that Cerberus research. Only the end result still wasn't able to prevent him from being indoctrinated himself and he succumbs to his own treachery.
Quote:
Now the questionable part. I am dissapointed that Bioware was so hellbent on keeping the damn Starbrat. But it is a good thing that they did give some exposition, including hints about the Starbrats origin. (An insane AI with God complex who turned on his masters and forced them to follow his "solution". I can buy that, as thats something we have suspected about Reapers all along) Overall its more fleshed out. Still, his existence renders Sovereign in Mass Effect 1 meaningless!
Yeah, I'm not fond of the Catalyst, especially as they have to make it use that damn kid at the beginning of the game as an avatar. That child was just really cliche "pathos" BioWare attempted to inject into the game, and he's supposed to "represent all those people who died back on Earth" according to the developers. Great. Considering how much death Shepard has seen---of people far more important to her/him---it's still silly that Shepard would be fretting over this one random child so much. It would have been
much much more effective in my opinion if BioWare had the Catalyst choose the squadmate you sacrificed back on Vermire as an avatar to speak with Shepard. Either Kaiden or Ashley. I mean come on, that should be obvious from a writer's standpoint!
Anyway, the Catalyst doesn't necessarily make Sovereign meaningless. If you recall Sovereign's "mission" was to activate the true potential of the Citadel to allow the Reaper fleets to pour in from dark space. They say the Citadel was "built by the Reapers" in ME1, and that too doesn't necessarily clash with the Catalyst, and it says the Citadel is only
part of it. It's "home" in the sense that an AI can be uploaded to a mainframe. It doesn't necessarily have to
originate at that location however. The Reapers are also controlled by the Catalyst, who evidently needs them to activate the Citadel anyway. The Catalyst's requiring Sovereign's aid in ME1 is no more silly than it requiring the Reapers do so in ME3, or to help it move the Citadel to Earth.
What strikes me as far sillier is the Human Reaper. See, the original writer of ME1 and ME2 planned for a totally different ending. The "Dark Energy" ending. In this continuity, the byproduct of the mass field effect is "dark energy," which threatens to extinguish the stars in the universe. This is what Tali was sent to investigate in ME2 when you meet up with her. The Reapers were originally supposed to have been created to solve this dark energy problem, and their harvesting of organics was in an attempt to utilize genetic diversity to come up with possible solutions. The Protheans were one of the most diverse races in the galaxy, but they resisted and their race was all but wiped out, the remaining members converted into Collectors instead. Then humanity came along. ME2 uses Mordin's recruitment mission as a chance to explain that humans are immune to the Reaper virus
because of their vast genetic diversity. So that is the entire reason for the Reaper's interest in humanity and their obsession with Shepard. They start building the Human Reaper in private as a last ditch effort to try and carry out their assigned purpose. At the end of ME3 we were originally going to choose between killing off the Reapers and trying to solve the dark energy issue without them---a more humane solution but a bigger gamble----or go along with it and let them make their Human Reaper and have a more assured future for species yet to come.
By changing the ending to the whole "organics vs. synthetics" thing, BioWare has really invalidated ME2 way more than anything else. The entire mission Tali was sent on, bothering to explain human genetic diversity, the Human Reaper, the fixation of the Reapers on humanity, etc. Even carrying over into the third game, why would the Reapers make Earth their primary target----their biggest object of fixation---if we're using the "organics v. synthetics" and not "dark energy" plot? Why move the Citadel and Catalyst to Earth? What was it they were "planning" according to Anderson? Methinks this was left over writing from the original plot. I would bet they changed the ending at the last minute for
some reason, and so it's much more of a mess than Karpyshawn's original script. The only viable explanation now for the Reaper's fixation on humanity is that Shepard, a human, killed Sovereign. You're going to have to put a lot of weight on that fact and say that Harbinger is making things pretty damn personal. If you're going to do that, then the lack of a showdown with Harbinger is even more disappointing. That, or the Reapers see humanity as the biggest threat now and so want to take care of them first. Perhaps a Human Reaper made in secrecy would have made the invasion that much easier? I dunno. It's a pretty shaky foundation to build a plot on top of compared to the original idea.