Quote:
*whew*
I'm always relaxed-just opinionated.
Have you tried any USB power supplies (Kingrex etc) for your SBT? I haven't, but there are some glowing reports out there...ya know, another thing to buy.
-Daniel
But really-what other amps have you 'lived with' for the HD800s? I'm curious, not trying to start something.
-Daniel
No, I haven't tried any USB power supplies (and I'm not sure what you're referring to - I've heard of upgraded wall warts, but that's about it). I stream via wi-fi in my home to my DAC via TOSLINK and Coax at the moment. Since I don't use the SBT's internal DAC or amplifier, I don't see any benefit in upgrading the wall-wart.
Ive tried a number of amps with the HD 800, but actually owned? Not many.
The amps I have "lived with" along with my HD800 include the Lyr, HA-160, DAC1, Objective2, Essence One Muses, my vintage integrated amps (Carver and Pioneer), and my modern Pioneer AVR's. Additionally, I have spent quality time in my home with the V800/V200 stack.
I have a couple of friends who likely have better hearing than me and they claim to hear subtle differences in "micro detail" from amp to amp. Personally, if I concentrate really hard, I think I might hear what they are talking about, but it's truly a labor to do so - I couldn't do it blind and certainly wouldn't do it while "just listening" to music.
And yes, of course I do hear differences between all of the amps I listed above. I thought the Schiit was too bright (Im told the stock tubes suck), the Burson was most liquid and smooth, the Benchmark the most neutral and articulate, the O2 was a harsher version of the Benchmark, and the Essence One is somewhere between the Burson and Benchmark. My Pioneer SC-25 AVR sounded virtually identical to the V200 to my ears, and even my friend, who is a professional sound recording engineer couldn't hear any difference - although to be fair, he thought he detected superior micro-detail with the Violectric. I couldn't hear what he described after numerous attempts.
I also have a hard time hearing the vague, subjective qualities like air, soundstage, PRaT, etc. and I personally think that a lot of those qualities are simply frequency response variations causing different "false acoutic" cues to be perceived. Maybe I'm wrong there, but it's hard to tell. I also play devil's advocate often because there is a strong tendency for people to use hyperbole when describing the sound they hear from one amp or another, or when comparing. Differences are perceptible to me, but they are rarely "night and day" or of the "I can tell from across the street" variety.
I think my overall opinion is that most amps, if operating within their comfortable power band, are of similar output impedance, and are not purposely designed to sound a "certain way," will basically sound the same - say 90%. It's the last 10% that most of these discussions are focusing on. A 10% that I'm not sure I need to personally worry about - I think my hearing changes more than 10% from day to day...