Quote:
I actually have a M9P and a Nikon D3s. Technologically speaking, the D3s does pretty much everything better than the M9P. However in terms of picture quality at lower iso settings, the pictures from the M9P just seems to look better IMHO. I'm just hoping the M240 would be able to at least give me the same picture quality but at the same time let me shoot at higher iso settings. I'm sure the EVF would help as well especially when I use a CPL filter.
It amazes me people are buying this camera at it's price point. I love Leicas and still shoot my iiif when using film, but I could not justify buying an m9 or 240, I do shoot digital with the X pro1 though. I originally bought it thinking I would use my Leica glass, but the Fuji glass is better too, and the whole system is still way cheaper thn the inferior digital camera body only. JMO.
I actually have a M9P and a Nikon D3s. Technologically speaking, the D3s does pretty much everything better than the M9P. However in terms of picture quality at lower iso settings, the pictures from the M9P just seems to look better IMHO. I'm just hoping the M240 would be able to at least give me the same picture quality but at the same time let me shoot at higher iso settings. I'm sure the EVF would help as well especially when I use a CPL filter.