m-i-c-k-e-y
Headphoneus Supremus
Yes, if the unit needs 0.5A it will only get what it needs.
Try switching to blue and it should take some of the brightness off.a Paul pang red lan cable from wall connected to one lan isolator that goes into streamer/dac
I think it makes the sound more bright and more resolution in top.
The exterior foil shield is tied to ground.
I would be inclined to believe you, except that Archimago told me he uses Yauhody CAT8 in a 10G system and it performs.
It was beneficial in my system, removed a bit of vocal sibilance, but like I said, my internet provider still uses copper. I'm not sure whether it would have the same benefit with a fiber feed.
Which brings us to the concept of "audiophile ethernet cables" (see here also, and recent mainstream press exposure of the "madness"). Let me be clear. If I have issues with USB cables, or SPDIF cables, making any significant contribution to audible sound quality (assuming again essentially error-free transmission of data), there is no rational explanation whatsoever that ethernet cables should make any difference. The TCP/IP protocol has error correction mechanisms that allow for worldwide transmission integrity (otherwise Internet financial transactions should be banned!), and is asynchronous so there is no temporal dependence on exact timing mechanisms (jitter not an issue with adequate buffer to reclock and feed the DAC). So long as the "protocol stack" is functioning as it should between the devices, there will not be any issue. Systematic errors causing audible distortion either means hardware failure or poorly implemented communication software. Therefore the expectation if we were to test or "listen to" different ethernet cables is that there would be no difference.
I believe if there indeed is an ethernet audio device that "sounds different" because of different cables being used, then that device should be returned because it is obviously defective. Remember folks, it is like accepting that the earth is spherical or that 2+2=4 - because that's just the way it is. Ethernet communication is an engineered system, the parameters and capabilities of this system is not only understood but designed to be the way it is by humans! You really cannot claim to have "discovered" some combination of dielectric or conductor or geometry that works "better" within an already errorless digital system unless you're claiming improved performance outside technical recommendations (
Ultimately, I'm not suggesting anyone use the cheapest ethernet cable he/she can find. If you like the esthetics and build construction, go for it! Just realize that it's essentially impossible to argue that a functioning (free of data transmission error) ethernet cable will "sound" any different or worthy of significant cost differential based on sonic quality. The idea of specialized "audiophile" ethernet cables (or "ethernet switches" for that matter) is plain nonsense.
Finally it’s here.
Setup was easy, will let it play for clock(OCXO) to settle
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on iFi audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I chose the Opto-DX route mostly out of curiosity. Eventually, I went with a different upscaling solution altogether ("pre-upscaling" music files using PGGB rather than using the M-Scaler to upscale in "real-time").@llamaluv, what steered you toward putting an Opto.DX between your DAVE and your HMS?
And what kind of Ethernet cables are you using from your router to the E8 switch, and from the E8 to your Bartok?
I have not, but the principal behind it sounds appealing. It'd be nice to avoid piling on more and more doo-dads, but oh well. I may have to look into it some more, thanksHave you tried the dual adot fibre converter? It’s supposed to remove all noise from Ethernet because fibre can’t transport noise. And then you go short Ethernet from last adot converter to dac/streamer
Finally it’s here.
Setup was easy, will let it play for clock(OCXO) to settle
![]()
I will definitely report back my positive impression so far but unfortunately I can't compare it with plain FMC as I never had it.So what was the difference from a plain FMC?