martook
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Posts
- 153
- Likes
- 17
Quote:
Well, some of them are cheap and you get a lot better lens compared to what Canon offers, for less money. But you do offer the auto focus and automatic stop down, so you have to be interested in shooting manually.
Oh yeah, I forgot to write that. I have the Tamron 28-75mm, and it's a great lens. Another reason I would much rather get the 24-105L over the 24-70L, I already have a fast lens with pretty much the same coverage...
10-22 and the tammy is not a bad setup, for sure... have you seen the pigeon shot? Eric Cotter [the OcularStasis FotoBlog]:
Originally Posted by lan /img/forum/go_quote.gif I"ve never tried any of those Zeiss or Leica lenses but one things for sure, I could have a lot more toys and fun for their big prices. Try the Tamron 28-75 also if you're interested in that range. It's f/2.8, it's cheap and will allow you to get flash and 10-22 NOW. |
Well, some of them are cheap and you get a lot better lens compared to what Canon offers, for less money. But you do offer the auto focus and automatic stop down, so you have to be interested in shooting manually.
Oh yeah, I forgot to write that. I have the Tamron 28-75mm, and it's a great lens. Another reason I would much rather get the 24-105L over the 24-70L, I already have a fast lens with pretty much the same coverage...
10-22 and the tammy is not a bad setup, for sure... have you seen the pigeon shot? Eric Cotter [the OcularStasis FotoBlog]: