Mavericksfan41
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 10
My Atrio Mg7's have been about completely worn out after 2 years of extensive use.. As far as basshead IEM's, is there anything ($250 or lower) that trumps the Mg7's yet?
How are you finding the m-100 compared to your others?
Just from initial impressions, (i know these will change with time) how does the m100 compare against the pro 900?
My Atrio Mg7's have been about completely worn out after 2 years of extensive use.. As far as basshead IEM's, is there anything ($250 or lower) that trumps the Mg7's yet?
Well, that's a no contest. Pro900 to me wins out in bass big time and overall sound. I happen to love the Pro 900. We'll see with more listening time for the M-100.
Thats awesome. I guess i'll go with the pro 900 then, as apparently bright highs have no effect on methanks btw.
Also, was it kees modded, or stock?
Thats awesome. I guess i'll go with the pro 900 then, as apparently bright highs have no effect on methanks btw.
Also, was it kees modded, or stock?
SOME people hate the shrill highs, but not all
I find the highs of the Sig Pro to be very present still, but dialed back a couple notches from the Pro 900, much more refined, with better extension, detail, and clarity.
It's like a photograph of a beautiful snowy, tree-filled landscape. On the Pro 900, someone turned the saturation all the way up, so it's in-your-face, bright, colors are distorted, etc...
The Sig Pro, the saturation is normal. There's the detail of the crystalline snow that you could not see previously through the distortion of the high saturation of the Pro 900. Everything looks clean, tight, and as it should be.
I am 53. And the treble of the Pro 900 are a bit too much for me too. So even age is relative regarding to sound preferences.P.S. I'd like to say, I think age and hearing play a MUCH bigger role than anyone realizes in how we perceive sound.