Anyone want to go into detail on the differences of the LCD-2 on the Asgard 2 vs. Lyr? I know the tube aspect is going to make it a completely different animal altogether, but I'm just curious if the Asgard 2 really does well with the latest revision, being that it is at the bottom end of the power requirement for the LCD-2 at 1 W. (LCD-2 Recommended power is 1-4 W). How about the difference of giving it more power on a different SS amp?
This was a while ago and with the original Asgard, although now that I've had the A2 for a while I'm inclined to think I would feel the same.
For me, I actually preferred the Asgard with the LCD-2s. I got to try the Lyr for a few hours with a number of different tubes (in a quiet hotel room, not meet conditions) and the best that I heard sounded similar to the Asgard, and the "worst" to my ears I didn't like nearly as much as the Asgard.
Now, quite possibly I just like solid state, and maybe I listen at lower volumes than most others or something, but for me I actually preferred the Asgard over the Lyr.
I would also mention that with some other cans like K701, being able to tube roll helped immensely as I found them way too bright on the Asgard. But for LCD-2s the Asgard was my preferred sound signature.
All listening at the time was done with an original Bifrost.
Unfortunately, this was quite a while ago, so while I remember my overall preference I couldn't tell you any real details as to why I preferred the Asgard.