RYCeT
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2003
- Posts
- 3,133
- Likes
- 64
1 drink per hour, 3 drink maximum in a bar is just impossible. What's next? Arresting young men for being a horny person.
![mad.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/mad.gif)
Originally Posted by Senn20 "Drunk in pub-LIC? I wanted to be drunk in a bar, which is perfectly legal. They THREW me into public. Arrest them!" |
Originally Posted by RYCeT 1 drink per hour, 3 drink maximum in a bar is just impossible. What's next? Arresting young men for being a horny person. ![]() |
Originally Posted by allenf Being horny and thirsty is not the exclusive preserve of the young you know ![]() |
Also, bartenders and wait-staff are also getting in trouble for serving over the 3 drink/1 drink an hour rule. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that even if bartenders and such WANTED to monitor and do everything by the book, some places it would just be humanly impossible to do. I've been in bars that are completely packed (reaching maximum capacity) down on 6th St. in Austin where there are only about 3 - 5 bartenders, so apparently they're supposed to keep track of everyone? Ridiculous. |
Originally Posted by catscratch This is why the whole "you broke the law, so pony up" attitude annoys the hell out of me. It's fine to say that when it's someone else's *** on the line, but when your time on ice rolls around, don't start crying about mitigating circumstances. I'm an old-school liberal at heart, not in the sense that the word "liberal" has come to mean, but actual enlightenment-era liberal. You know - life, liberty, privacy, pursuit of happiness, that sort of thing. It's ok if you've never heard of it - somehow, nobody else seems to have ![]() I will respect head-fi's "no politics" rule and ****. But you can guess what I was going to say anyway ![]() The State should exist to serve the people. Instead, it exists to perpetuate itself. |
Originally Posted by SennFan Note to self: Do not go to any bars in TX ![]() |