Latest Thread Images

T-PEOS H-200 - new triple hybrid IEM - Impressions thread
Aug 4, 2013 at 3:07 AM Post #2,026 of 2,595
kimvictor said:
Lol. I'm burning in my H-200 for addition 20hrs to see if the peak tames down. 

Also, I'm really tempted to buy the TF10 or MDR 7550. Damn. Anyone willing to trade for my H-200?
biggrin.gif


What do you guys recommend more? TF10 or 7550?
Click to expand...


I recommend you the H-200 over those two IEMs.

Time for you to realise what you have at hand.
 
Aug 4, 2013 at 5:01 AM Post #2,028 of 2,595
Kim, H200 is supposed to be fun IEM, not neutral. enjoy H200 and look to add neutral wider stage sounding IEM and you will have a winning combo.
 
Aug 4, 2013 at 8:41 AM Post #2,030 of 2,595
Quote:
kimvictor said:
Yup. My UERM is doing a perfect job as neutral wide iem, but the really find the H-200 to be too harsh in it's upper mids.
Click to expand...

 
Measurements (from Rin Choi if you check his blog) actually tell you a reason for this.  There is a dip in the 2-3 kHz range after you DF and/or OW compensate for it while the H-200 does indeed have a bump in the 3-4 kHz area.  The 2-3 kHz area is actually quite neutral.  So with the differences added together, the mids will sound harsh in contrast to the UERM. 
 
___
 
I do want to say that I did post my review on Head-Fi.  I know the original was posted quite a while ago, if you read that one already, they are the same :wink:  I definitely will be adding comparisons to that thread with time :D
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/675358/review-t-peos-h-200
 
Aug 4, 2013 at 9:38 AM Post #2,031 of 2,595
Quote:
tinyman392 said:
 
Measurements (from Rin Choi if you check his blog) actually tell you a reason for this.  There is a dip in the 2-3 kHz range after you DF and/or OW compensate for it while the H-200 does indeed have a bump in the 3-4 kHz area.  The 2-3 kHz area is actually quite neutral.  So with the differences added together, the mids will sound harsh in contrast to the UERM. 
 
___
 
I do want to say that I did post my review on Head-Fi.  I know the original was posted quite a while ago, if you read that one already, they are the same :wink:  I definitely will be adding comparisons to that thread with time :D
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/675358/review-t-peos-h-200
Click to expand...

Nice review!
 
Aug 10, 2013 at 5:47 PM Post #2,033 of 2,595
My reviews is up: http://www.head-fi.org/t/676343/review-t-peos-h-200-triple-driver-hybrid-iem
 
Aug 10, 2013 at 10:04 PM Post #2,034 of 2,595
^Well done Randomkid! Keeping it short and precise makes your review a pleasure to read.
Keep it up!
 
Aug 11, 2013 at 10:57 PM Post #2,035 of 2,595
Hi people :)
Good to see you again and I'm here bring to a small news about new product of T-PEOS.
It's name is "POPULAR" and targeted to low-cost market: about USD 15 to 20 ? (in South Korea also 15,000 won to 20,000 won)
 

 
It looks like a part of 80's car design, or car engine silinder.
Material seems to be used Aluminium.
 
I think it will inherits popularity of RICH-100 model.
 
And I'm waiting RICH-100 from Korean eBay (ordered today, delivery will in tomorrow.) to compare what is different sound between.
I hope it hears really fun sound.
 
Aug 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM Post #2,036 of 2,595
Working on comparisons.  The H-200 still proves to be one of the worst IEMs I have to place in my ears...  Just so hard for me to get a proper fit with them.  Once I do, they sound phenomenal, but I question whether or not the time is worth it XD  Still, comparisons are upcoming.  I've got the RE-400, SuperDart, and PFE232 in the comparison list.  Any others people wish to see? 
 
EDIT: the SuperDart is actually a great alternative to the H-200 for those with fit issues.  Very similar sound signature at a similar price point (~300 dollars direct).  Might be worth a look for people who enjoyed the H-200 sound :wink:
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 7:23 AM Post #2,039 of 2,595
Quote:
tinyman392 said:
Working on comparisons.  The H-200 still proves to be one of the worst IEMs I have to place in my ears...  Just so hard for me to get a proper fit with them.  Once I do, they sound phenomenal, but I question whether or not the time is worth it XD  Still, comparisons are upcoming.  I've got the RE-400, SuperDart, and PFE232 in the comparison list.  Any others people wish to see? 
 
EDIT: the SuperDart is actually a great alternative to the H-200 for those with fit issues.  Very similar sound signature at a similar price point (~300 dollars direct).  Might be worth a look for people who enjoyed the H-200 sound :wink:
Click to expand...

Would really like to see a comparison with UE900 with pinhole blocked. The H-200 has been on my radar for quite a while now, just wondering how different is it from my UE900.
 
Thanks!
 
Aug 12, 2013 at 7:47 AM Post #2,040 of 2,595
Quote:
lalala6 said:
Would really like to see a comparison with UE900 with pinhole blocked. The H-200 has been on my radar for quite a while now, just wondering how different is it from my UE900.
 
Thanks!
Click to expand...

I haven't heard the UE900 with pinhole blocked, but UE900s are much smoother and wider, and more natural. H-200 has more impactful bass and clarity, but with harsh edges. If you are looking for more intimate and aggressive sound, H-200 is a good side step from UE900. Personally, I much preferred UE900(that's because I'm a smoothness and neutrality head). Detail and soundstage wise, UE900 is better, but H-200 has better clarity and bass impact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top