Got my H-100 II today... Whoever said they were V-shaped, I've got no clue where you got that from
These seem like a very sweet, thin, mid-range focused phone. Bass extends well and deep with excellent texturing and tightness, however, the body is quite small (due to no mid-bass). The midrange has an aggressive feel to it with quite a bit of sweetness (and a hint of sibilance) while the treble is actually slightly improved from the previous models (including the H-200) in terms of extension, still has a bit of smearing and edgyness to it. Still love the the low-treble that T-Peos seems to not forget about. It's what comes after it that drops off. Surprisingly, the sound reminds me of something like an Etymotic or RE-400, though both are a little more refined in sound (the RE-400 is also a bit warmer and thicker in tone). These can sound a little cold and unforgiving, so give it a good recording. That said, these measure surprisingly linear:
Measurements of the H-200 are for comparison. As I've noted in the past, the spikes at 90 Hz are a flaw (resonance) of my system, that spike should not be there.
EDIT: Updates... As you can see from the measurements above, the H-100 II measures better than the H-200, which is quite odd
Additionally, I do prefer this sound signature better. The treble is losing its edgyness without losing the texture, which is a great thing. The midrange is a little bright still... If T-Peos could somehow combine the midrange warmth of the H-200, the bass and treble of the H-100, they might have a killer IEM!