swmtnbiker
Previously known as dpippel
Quote:
Of course it wouldn't have been enforcable. Like the "do not copy" clause in software end-user agreements, it merely needed to be STATED so buyers were aware of the seller's position. All I'm saying is that the indignation and self-righteous chest beating directed at the VERY small number of people selling HF-1's on eBay rings a bit hollow when no "rules" were ever defined.
Like I said, everyone involved should get over it and move on. Personally I don't see what the big deal is or why some noses are so out of joint. No amount of pissing and moaning or wishful hindsight is going to change what's happened. We're all adults here - let's just quit dwelling on the bad and be thankful for the good shall we? That's all I'm saying on the matter. I'm done.
Originally Posted by Jahn Totally unenforceable. What would Todd/Grado say? "I saw you trying to sell the HF-1, give it back"? Such a condition wouldn't have prevented "human nature" regardless - no one here is really the Headphone Police, so it comes down to pleading to the higher qualities of our nature - assuming of course that you agree that not selling them that way is indeed the moral high ground - that's up to you and everyone else to decide that for themselves. |
Of course it wouldn't have been enforcable. Like the "do not copy" clause in software end-user agreements, it merely needed to be STATED so buyers were aware of the seller's position. All I'm saying is that the indignation and self-righteous chest beating directed at the VERY small number of people selling HF-1's on eBay rings a bit hollow when no "rules" were ever defined.
Like I said, everyone involved should get over it and move on. Personally I don't see what the big deal is or why some noses are so out of joint. No amount of pissing and moaning or wishful hindsight is going to change what's happened. We're all adults here - let's just quit dwelling on the bad and be thankful for the good shall we? That's all I'm saying on the matter. I'm done.