Sub-$100 closed cans: HD280 vs SRH 440/840 vs Audio Technica M50
Oct 27, 2009 at 9:21 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 23

ductrung3993

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Posts
680
Likes
31
The title said it
wink.gif
The main points that I'm looking for is SQ, comfort and Isolation (not as important) and degree of forgiveness
atsmile.gif


I listen to all kind of music so yeah, looking for an all arounder
wink.gif


Thanks in advance
happy_face1.gif


Edited: Please give me some info on comparing possible/ reasons if possible. Thanks!
 
Oct 27, 2009 at 4:44 PM Post #8 of 23
I'm in the same suit as you, I've been suggested the M50, ES7, HD448 & Denon AH-D1001.


Force
 
Oct 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM Post #9 of 23
Since I'm a noob, the setup would just be ipod/computer (hopefully with X-Fi laptop card). My music are mostly 128kbps so I will consider forgiveness here
wink.gif


PS: Anyone know how to convert all my crappy music to a better quality quickly?
 
Oct 28, 2009 at 11:02 AM Post #10 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by Force /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'm in the same suit as you, I've been suggested the M50, ES7, HD448 & Denon AH-D1001.


Force



yes, I am in the same boat. looking for non-fatiguing cheap (<200) headphones. Leaning towards d1001 or shr840 but also interested in 448 (why no buzz about those on headfi?) and ES7. Help would be much appreciated.
 
Oct 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM Post #11 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by ductrung3993 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
PS: Anyone know how to convert all my crappy music to a better quality quickly?


If you happen to have your CD rips lying around as .wav or preferably .flac files it should be pretty easy.

But you cannot convert your 128 kbps mp3's into something better, since the mp3 codec is lossy - with every conversion you lose something.
(That's called transcoding, which is frowned upon.)
 
Oct 28, 2009 at 6:14 PM Post #12 of 23
I have the SRH440: Like it mucho. It's great with my Zune unamped and shines with my BB2.02. Fun with great range and decent isolation. Deep bass, good mids and decent trebles. Got it for 75 off of Amazon. The 840 pads fit the 440 and are significantly softer than stock.

I like them much more than the HD280s that crapped-out during burn-in and were returned. I've read that the 840s must be amped to sound their best.
 
Oct 30, 2009 at 5:49 AM Post #14 of 23
I haven't heard the SRH-440 but I have heard the SRH-840, HD-280, and I own an M50. Without a doubt, the SRH-840 is the best sounding phone, even without an amp. (It's very natural sounding and seems to have a wider sound stage than the others) The HD-280 is very neutral but it's a little underwhelming; I feel that it takes some of the life out of music but that's a personal preference. However if you're a base head, the M50 is definitely the phone for you. The base has much greater impact on the M50 than the 840, but sometimes that makes them sound congested. One thing to keep in mind is that the M50 requires a lot of burn-in. (My pair took over 200 hours before it was palatable)

On a side note, I actually modded my M50 to attenuate the base and bring out the mids by removing the felt plug Audio-Technica put in the back of the driver and adding some fiber-loft for additional damping. IMO that gave them a much less congested and more "open" sound. I also dynamatted the cups to improve isolation and reduce leakage.
 
Oct 30, 2009 at 6:23 AM Post #15 of 23
I am using the Denon AH-D1001 and I find them very good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top