eskamobob1
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Posts
- 1,587
- Likes
- 2,219
Agree with all of this. I think staging, imaging and layering can all be improved while maintaining a smooth tonality.
The roll off in the highs definitely contributes to the "smoothness" of the CRBN. I think it's generally harder to achieve that type of smoothness while also having great extension in the highs, which also impacts perceived detail. Everyone's varying tolerances complicates this further. Some people are simply more sensitive to treble energy--something that's harsh and bright to one person may not all be to another. I think the x9000 has a pretty decent balance in this regard, but some still have mentioned a bit of brightness for their liking.
But I'd be just fine with the CRBN keeping its current tuning (again, it's very enjoyable), if the staging opened up considerably and if the holographic layering stats are known for were present. Hopefully in a future release.
Yah. Pretty much my only complaint with crbn Is that it's over damped. That said, imo, it 1,000% competes (and maybe wins) at its price point. It's just when we start going "the top offering from each company" where it starts to fall behind (and only realy to stuff 50%+ more expensive to boot)