appar111
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2002
- Posts
- 4,240
- Likes
- 14
Quote:
I don't really view it as bass deficiency.. I honestly didn't notice much more bass with the 225's--certainly not enough for me to justify spending $130 more. Maybe there was more bass, but since there was also more treble, it wasn't as apparent to me since both ends of the spectrum were boosted.
Originally Posted by crazyfrenchman27 From what I remember, my major qualm with the SR60s was what I perceived as a bass deficiency. I have not had that problem with the SR225. Otherwise, they are very similar in many respects, especially if they both have bowls. |
I don't really view it as bass deficiency.. I honestly didn't notice much more bass with the 225's--certainly not enough for me to justify spending $130 more. Maybe there was more bass, but since there was also more treble, it wasn't as apparent to me since both ends of the spectrum were boosted.