kazaakas
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2012
- Posts
- 168
- Likes
- 26
Quote:
I know, I know, what I ment was:
The STX is usually chosen over the Titanium HD, presumably (at least, i presume) because the persons reviewing it get a better listening experience because of using the STX's integrated amp and the Titanium HD doesn't have one.
For people like me who are interested in both of these cards but want to use an external amp it get very very confusing since the reviews on the STX are biased because the reviewers use its integrated amp. And I'm not intersted in that integrated amp anyway.
To put this another way:
"In terms of sound quality, the STX is without a doubt more populair than the Titanium HD when used without any other equipment directly plugged into the headphone"
"So, in terms of sound quality, when one wants to use an external amp anyway, it's unclear wether the STX would still be the preferrable choice since it's popularity is probably because people without external amps liked its listening experience better because they still got some kind of an amp because the internal amplifier"
-----
Anyway, if the Titanium HD supports surround virtualisation techs through RCA thats a big plus for competetive multiplayers first person shooter games for me.
Since I'll be using a headphone that can be described as a bit harsh/bright, the general warmer signature of the titanium HD would be better for a natural sound than the already harsh STX .
And since you guys are telling me the DAC on the Titanium is slightly better than the STX, my question of which would be better when using an external amp is pretty much already answered isn't it?
Having an integrated headphone amp doesn't translate into higher sound quality, especially when considering the Essence STX headphone amp has a quite harsh signature.
I personally find that having separate gear allows for far better flexibility on my setups, mixing and matching exactly the gear I want rather than having components that I either don't use or that will alter the signature in a way that goes against my listening preferences.
I know, I know, what I ment was:
The STX is usually chosen over the Titanium HD, presumably (at least, i presume) because the persons reviewing it get a better listening experience because of using the STX's integrated amp and the Titanium HD doesn't have one.
For people like me who are interested in both of these cards but want to use an external amp it get very very confusing since the reviews on the STX are biased because the reviewers use its integrated amp. And I'm not intersted in that integrated amp anyway.
To put this another way:
"In terms of sound quality, the STX is without a doubt more populair than the Titanium HD when used without any other equipment directly plugged into the headphone"
"So, in terms of sound quality, when one wants to use an external amp anyway, it's unclear wether the STX would still be the preferrable choice since it's popularity is probably because people without external amps liked its listening experience better because they still got some kind of an amp because the internal amplifier"
-----
Anyway, if the Titanium HD supports surround virtualisation techs through RCA thats a big plus for competetive multiplayers first person shooter games for me.
Since I'll be using a headphone that can be described as a bit harsh/bright, the general warmer signature of the titanium HD would be better for a natural sound than the already harsh STX .
And since you guys are telling me the DAC on the Titanium is slightly better than the STX, my question of which would be better when using an external amp is pretty much already answered isn't it?
