Post title:
"Yes, an Amp Makes a Difference"
I've had these headphones for a couple of months now... time for me to speak up...
First, a bit of useful background. I've been interested in hi-fi for about 20 years or so, and specifically head-fi for nearly 15 of those. After going through many different phone/amp combinations (list of past gear shown in my profile), I settled on a nice combo that really scratched all of my itches: Keces DA-152 USB DAC/amp feeding a pair of Sennheiser HD-600 (w/Headphile BlackSilver V2 cable). I compared this combo directly to many other systems at meet-ups, conventions, etc., and I was constantly pleased (and surprised) with how it held up. It was good enough to keep and cart around the world for a couple of international moves. Sadly, I ended up needing to sell the system for financial reasons a few years ago (****ing Sydney is so goddamn expensive...), which left me with no reference system for music listening. Oh well, life goes on.
Fast forward a few years... I find myself wanting to get back into the game, but searching for a closed-back solution because my reference system will end up going in my office. So my task was to try to "recreate" the feel of the Keces/Sennheiser system with closed headphones. A tough task, to be sure, since part of the magic of the HD-600s is in their open nature. After weeks of research and reading, I decided to take a gamble on the MDR-7520s due to: (1) a frequency response that appears to be similar to the HD-600s, and (2) low end texture and punch, which I remember enjoying on properly amped HD-600s.
So now that you know where I was coming from when I got the 7520s: am I happy with the results?
Yes and
no. It all depends on
the source/amp.
I'm not going to provide a breakdown about frequency ranges, soundstage, etc. I don't think I can really add anything new to what's already been reported in this thread. Instead, what I think I can provide is a bit of clarity on an issue that I don't think has been addressed very well here:
proper amping of the MDR-7520.
The same thing is repeated often about these headphones: "They don't need an amp". Well, yes and no. Do they need amplification to reach comfortable volume levels? Absolutely not. They are incredibly sensitive and need very little power to get you where you're going. But that doesn't mean that a good amp pairing
won't make them sound better. The
right amp
makes a huge difference.
I first did a lot of listening with "unamped" sources (i.e., onboard amplification): iPhone 6 and onboard headphone output on a ThinkPad T470s, both playing Spotify at "very high" quality (~320 kbps, as far as I understand). With these sources, the experience was very pleasant: the frequency response was precisely what I was expecting (and what I was hoping for). I was very happy with this result, but neither source gave quite the transient punch I was expecting from all of the 7520 reviews I read. Well, I also had two USB DAC/amp units sitting around to try: Fiio E10 (first gen, not the E10k) and HotAudio Bit Perfect. Both are budget units (<$100), but again, what I read both in this thread and elsewhere on the internet
suggested strongly that this shouldn't matter much: as long as the DAC is doing its job well, the differences between a budget unit and a higher-end one shouldn't be that noticeable when using low impedance and sensitive phones, such as the MDR-7520. Nonetheless, the Sonys revealed pretty stark differences between the two DAC/amp units: the Fiio E10 had more of the punch I was looking for but revealed an uncomfortable amount of sibilance on way too many recordings, while the Bit Perfect had much smoother treble but pretty loose and muddy bass.
This experience taught me two things: punch was possible with the 7520s
when using the right source and amplification, and the frequency response I desired was also possible with the 7520s
when using the right source and amplification. I just had to find a way to get both. After a lot more research, I decided that the iFi Nano iDSD Black Label should likely be a good candidate for pairing with the MDR-7520 for three reasons: (1) issues with sibilance didn't seem to appear often in the reviews I read, (2) clarity, punch, and imaging were constant themes in the reviews, and (3) the iEMatch output would probably work well for the high sensitivity of the 7520s, giving finer control over volume and allowing the volume to be used above low levels where channel imbalance can often be an issue with sensitive phones.
Well, the Nano just arrived yesterday... and I haven't been able to stop listening. I fell asleep last night to Jimmy Smith's euphoric organ tones, and I continued listening when I woke up this morning and haven't really stopped for the past three hours. The MDR-7520 are just
that enjoyable...
when properly amped. I find myself unable to stop moving my body to the music (even when typing this line, I'm tapping my feet and fingers to Frank Sinatra's "Fly Me To The Moon"). Is this increased PRAT? I've never really understood how to translate that concept to actual listening experience. Whatever it is, the 7520s, when fed by the Nano, are
fun headphones: frequency response that is both even throughout the range and extended at both ends (but with smooth treble), punchy transients at all frequency ranges, and some of the best instrument separation and tonality I've ever heard.
So, in conclusion: I actually think that the MDR-7520 headphones are
better than Keces/HD-600 combo I used to own and loved so much...
when properly amped. The Sonys weren't able to get there on their own, and they weren't able to get there with amps that weren't good matches. It's only with the matching of the Nano that they show their capabilities. When "unamped" or with budget DAC/amp combos, the MDR-7520 are very, very good... but with the iFi Nano, the MDR-7520 are possibly the best headphones I've owned, and I dare say among some of the best I've heard (for my tastes, at least).
Obligatory drool tax: