AustinValentine
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2013
- Posts
- 432
- Likes
- 216
re: sibilance.
Based on my thoughts i'd say that your looking at reproduction "issues" not so much of an emphasis on the 7520.
My theory on this is batch variation.
If you look at my comments (much much) earlier in the thread, I had one that was seriously hot in the sibilance region before. Like, cutting levels of painful. Made the sibilance on the HD25/Amperior sound like the sonic equivalent of a butter knife. It wasn't extra detail extraction as with the HD800 either (i.e. microscope effect)...it was just plain hot, a nasty emphasis between 6-7k. I really didn't know how people could listen to this headphone for any prolonged period of time.
The one that I have on hand now sounds astoundingly different. I've listened to it with both my old upstream gear and my current gear to make sure that it's not that difference that was the cause. With the new pair, I can use my standard sibilance testing tracks even without extra discomfort. The differences extend beyond just sibilance too - the lower mids seem more forward, they were fairly recessed in the first pair I had. The first pair that I had also had an extremely dry sound to it. The new ones aren't lush or particularly warm sounding, but they also don't have the dry etched grain of the first pair. Other than those differences, the essential character of the two pairs that I had remains the same - both have superb detail extraction/plankton retrieval, both have excellent astoundingly well-extended bass, etc. etc.
I'd have thought it was just people's hearing, track selections/quality, or upstream gear myself if I hadn't heard such a difference between the two pairs. Sony doesn't particularly have a reputation for having widespread pair variance...unlike, say, Beyerdynamic. But I think that there are at least two slightly different sounding versions of this 7520 circulating.