Kabonfaiba
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2015
- Posts
- 131
- Likes
- 45
I really don't trust Trusted Reviews when it comes to headphones. I used to gather insight from it, but the author's taste seems to change, as and when it's required to accommodate a point, when just the opposite is true in another review. Basically, there's no consistency, marking is often unexplained - seems to reflect personal taste rather than facts, and few remarks about dynamics, and comfort don't seem to line up with what I've found in reality.
But anyway, talking about the 100-AAP review; I expected higher than 8 stars. Why? The author favours balanced, flat signatures as being the best and most "Hi-Fi", so then why didn't it score higher than the 1A?
Apparently the 100-AAP also lacks the dynamism and excitement found in the M2 and ATH-M50x - these are two completely different sounding headphones. And the 100-AAP isn't as exciting as either?! The M2 does NOT do bass punch, the M50x is mid recessed... so where does the 100AAP scale in this comparison? Worse than both apparently.
But anyway, talking about the 100-AAP review; I expected higher than 8 stars. Why? The author favours balanced, flat signatures as being the best and most "Hi-Fi", so then why didn't it score higher than the 1A?
Apparently the 100-AAP also lacks the dynamism and excitement found in the M2 and ATH-M50x - these are two completely different sounding headphones. And the 100-AAP isn't as exciting as either?! The M2 does NOT do bass punch, the M50x is mid recessed... so where does the 100AAP scale in this comparison? Worse than both apparently.