SongView.org Project

Jan 14, 2007 at 10:47 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 102

colonelkernel8

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Posts
3,175
Likes
444
Location
Minneapolis

Click the image to visit SongView.org

SongView was created to provide a means of compiling wave graphs of music for analysis by the hi-fi/audiophile community. The origin of the idea came from Esidarap and toastmaster on this thread.

Discover which albums are mixed the best, the worst, and everything in between. Which mixers are the best? Which artists care most about the SQ of their albums? Find out this and more.

Everyone come join the wiki and start editing/adding.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:04 PM Post #3 of 102
Not to take away from the great things toastmaster is doing by starting the site or anything, but the original wiki idea was mine.
plainface.gif
frown.gif


Anyway, that's a really nice logo. I like the wave.
tongue.gif


We need to agree on a format for posting these charts.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:11 PM Post #5 of 102
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esidarap /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Not to take away from the great things toastmaster is doing by starting the site or anything, but the original wiki idea was mine.
plainface.gif
frown.gif


Anyway, that's a really nice logo. I like the wave.
tongue.gif


We need to agree on a format for posting these charts.



The original idea for a forum/webpage was mine and then you suggested a wiki. Let's work as a team.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showpo...5&postcount=99
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:12 PM Post #6 of 102
lol, everyone who claims responsibility for the idea, please, post now.

Start editing you guys. Who is the admin? We need him to change the navigation so we can set up a system/format for posting a wave. We want to include as much information as possible. (Song title, artists, record label, format, mixer, recording engineer, as well as the actual graph.)
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:13 PM Post #7 of 102
Then let's just credit the "Head-fi community" before we start disagreeing on something this silly.
tongue.gif


So, what do you guys think about a format for posting the graphs? Any ideas?
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:18 PM Post #9 of 102
Quote:

Originally Posted by colonelkernel8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
lol, everyone who claims responsibility for the idea, please, post now.

Start editing you guys. Who is the admin? We need him to change the navigation so we can set up a system/format for posting a wave. We want to include as much information as possible. (Song title, artists, record label, format, mixer, recording engineer, as well as the actual graph.)



I'm admin right now. I'll see what I can do later tonight and in coming days about giving others admin rights and editing the structure.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:36 PM Post #12 of 102
Quote:

Originally Posted by colonelkernel8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
lol, everyone who claims responsibility for the idea, please, post now.

Start editing you guys. Who is the admin? We need him to change the navigation so we can set up a system/format for posting a wave. We want to include as much information as possible. (Song title, artists, record label, format, mixer, recording engineer, as well as the actual graph.)



Well technically i posted the first waveform and suggested a thread to post waveforms..
icon10.gif


..as for the format i think it should be arranged alphabetically by artist , and that song name , and the sourceand date be listed too such as

Abba
Waterloo
From: greatest hits 2001 cd.
 
Jan 14, 2007 at 11:45 PM Post #15 of 102
I want to help contribute too, I just signed up under the username Asr.

IMO waves should be stored in this hierarchy:

- Artist
-- CD
--- Track

UPC and record label should also be indexed though so people can search for those. I'm not sure what purpose indexing the recording engineer will serve.

There should also be standardization of which program to use for the displaying of the waveform. How about Audacity?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top