Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMahler /img/forum/go_quote.gif
So the question is....
Considering the larger price jumps within than grado line than that of the Beyer / Sennheiser / AKG line, is it worth paying for their top model when it is 500 dollars more (not 100 dollars more like Sennheiser).........
|
David, no one on this board can answer that question for you. We can only share with you our value judgments and explain our decision-making process. Whether it bears any relevance to your situation is for you to decide. I don't see anything wrong with tying to arrive at a value judgment. I argued this point in the HD800 appreciation thread. I'm always asking myself if it is "worth it," and there is always risk in any purchase that you will end up disappointed.
What is it that you think you are paying for in a headphone? Are you buying sound? Aesthetics? Build quality? Forget about Grado for a moment and apply the question to any headphone. Is the HD800, for example, worth nearly $1,100 more than the HD650/600 (which by a lot of accounts are already excellent headpones)? Is it worth $1,400? By what criteria do you judge its worth?
I recently bought a pair of GS-1000s. I always wanted to try them but had trouble persuading myself that they were a good use of $1,000. And I apply that value judgment to any headphone that sells for more than $1,000 -- not just Grados. The solution for me was to buy them used, and I found a pair for $675 in FS forum. So for less than the retail price of a new pair of RS-1s I got to try the GS-1000s, and I felt much better about the value proposition. As it turns out I actually like the GS-1000s quite a bit. But I didn't know that in advance, and it was the uncertainty that made me a bit skittish.
It is also what makes me a bit leary about buying the HD800 or a Stax setup. I'm not interested in "different" sounding headphones. For a premium price I want premium sound, and to me that translates into sound that approaches what a good pair of loudspeakers can do. I won't say that aestethics and build quality are not important to me. They are. But form takes a back seat to function. On the other hand, I would not buy a headphone if it looked like to two piles of dog poop strapped to my head no matter how great they sounded. So there are limits to how far I will go. I think the HD800s are rather hideous looking, but I have to admit that I am interested -- though perhaps not right now. I have other headphone priorities that will keep my busy for the next three months or so.
Then there is the AKG K1000. Yes, they are discontinued and they are a unique headphone to be sure. As I recall the price was about $700. People are paying $1,200 and more for used ones now. Why? I can't answer that for anyone else. But I have a pair on the way that should be here in a few days. The K1000 was discontinued at about the time I became a serious headphone listener. I had a mild fascination with them over the past few years and noted what people were paying for the privilege of trying them. While I have found something to like in just about every headphone I have owned, none were without weaknesses and none sounded anything like loudspeakers. The latter was my attraction to the K1000. As it turned out I was the recipient of an amazing deal on mine but I was prepared to pay as much as $1,300 to try them. I put that value on them for their
promise of a speaker-like presentation. If I was judging them on looks alone I might value them at $100 or so.
I can tell you from first-hand experience that the Grado GS-1000 sounds nothing at all like the RS-1s, which also sounds different from the SR-325. Someone else might tell you they all sound the same. What is it that you expect to be different in the RS-1s or GS-1000s from the lower priced models? I expect them to sound better (naturally what goes into "better" sound might be different for someone else).
--Jerome