jiiteepee
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Posts
- 1,606
- Likes
- 62
Quote:
The IIEQ preset #6 you mention is only for this version of IIEQ
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8338/iieqriaakv5.jpg
and for operating @ 44.1kHz (I have not measured if it works well @ higher samplerates (this depends on IIEQ features/quality)).
If you don't have it (as it's discontinued) then you need to use ddmf:SmallEQ w/ this preset (this is as accurate now as the IIEQ preset).
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7881/smalleqiu2.jpg
You get the SmallEQ downloaded by selecting the FREEWARE section on ddmf site (it's last item in the scrollable list there).
EDIT:
Quote:
I don't understand why this answer you got ... person who gave this answer maybe doesn't know the software DSP area well (what all we use on our DAWs?).
Here are couple results from measures done w/ VST Plug-in Analyzer software. Harmonic distortion @ 44.1kHz for this ddmf:IIEQ VST implementation is :
http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/8...eqhd441da8.jpg
and phase:
http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/4828/iieqph441hk2.jpg
so, it looks like even the phase aren't whacked.
(RIAA backround)
jiitee
Originally Posted by doctorcilantro /img/forum/go_quote.gif Is this the correct IIEQ for the .fxp you posted on rapidshare? I note the Pro, Normal (pic below), and the often mentioned Small version, but haven't seen the Small one for download. I'm using ddfm_IIEQ-RIAA_Reproduction-6.fxp with this one: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nSEQXVMP03...s1600/IIEQ.jpg |
The IIEQ preset #6 you mention is only for this version of IIEQ
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/8338/iieqriaakv5.jpg
and for operating @ 44.1kHz (I have not measured if it works well @ higher samplerates (this depends on IIEQ features/quality)).
If you don't have it (as it's discontinued) then you need to use ddmf:SmallEQ w/ this preset (this is as accurate now as the IIEQ preset).
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7881/smalleqiu2.jpg
You get the SmallEQ downloaded by selecting the FREEWARE section on ddmf site (it's last item in the scrollable list there).
EDIT:
Quote:
The standard RIAA curve has only three time constants. I'm not quite sure how much error will accumulate (I'm speaking of generating spurious distortion and noise, etc., not RIAA error) from those 10 EQ filters, which are probably state variable filters; at least 4 separate coefficients per filter = 40 total; that is one heck of a lot of computation; also, a highpass rumble filter is necessary to remove the LF shelf in that response, or you will have problems. And aside from all that, I don't think that anyone would ever contemplate doing it this way in the analog domain, either... |
I don't understand why this answer you got ... person who gave this answer maybe doesn't know the software DSP area well (what all we use on our DAWs?).
Here are couple results from measures done w/ VST Plug-in Analyzer software. Harmonic distortion @ 44.1kHz for this ddmf:IIEQ VST implementation is :
http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/8...eqhd441da8.jpg
and phase:
http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/4828/iieqph441hk2.jpg
so, it looks like even the phase aren't whacked.
(RIAA backround)
jiitee