You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Shure SRH1540 Review
- Thread starter kimvictor
- Start date
hodgjy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Posts
- 4,304
- Likes
- 1,221
Actually, if my memory serves me right, these are actually like an 840 with more impact down low, and a wider soundstage. More technically refined, also....
They share a number of tonal qualities, but the relative treble spike at 9 khz affects some listeners. That's what I was going on. But, I haven't heard them, so I have no other rebuttal than that. Can't say anything more.
Change is Good
Headphoneus Supremus
Which was my point about the 1540 being more technically refined. If one likes the 840, and would like some more bass and a wider soundstage... which in result leads to smoother treble... then the 1540 is the perfect choice for an upgrade.
It improves on that Shure sound of the 840... without being completely different.
hodgjy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Posts
- 4,304
- Likes
- 1,221
Background, I'm 30 (from Australia) and listen to a lot of punk/rock/metal/hardcore/indie music and do some music production at home.... but the way you guys use adjectives on sound is still a bit foreign to me
For me clarity/soundstage is really key, I've got a pair of KRK-ROKIT's I use at home for everyday speakers and just love them over "the best logitech setup" etc. I guess I like super neutral things and can sit back and appreciate however good/bad the recording is without having to tweak bass/treble... I just accept the music as it comes to me.
So treble on the hot side, doesn't sound super appealing from a music recording point of view but from a listening pov I might be misinterpreting it.
I guess based on your suggestion the Shure's might be the winner.
Another thing that has me worried about the T90's is the fixed cord... do these things actually last 5+ years? Something about being able to get a new cable appeals to me (but I admit I do hate how it does the split thing halfway down the cable on the shures, but I can deal).
The 1540s do have very nice treble, and it extends very high and clear. I'm not usually believer in break in, but the treble did come to life after some good break in.
FenixSyd
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
The 1540s do have very nice treble, and it extends very high and clear. I'm not usually believer in break in, but the treble did come to life after some good break in.
Thanks guys,
It would be SUPER handy to have a local shop to test these things in but alas, nothing.
The store I'm going to order them from is interstate but they allow an exchange within 20 days. I'll probably end up ordering the 1540's and if my itch isn't quite scratched I'll do an exchange.... and if the T90's aren't worth it again I'll do a double exchange back to the 1540's (they've already said this is fine to do).
I guess the real question is..... Are the 1540's worth the money/a noteworthy upgrade from the 840's. From everything I've read the answer is yes... I mean even comfortwise they look WAY more comfortable going from the leathery style earpads to that softer material.
hodgjy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Posts
- 4,304
- Likes
- 1,221
Thanks guys,
It would be SUPER handy to have a local shop to test these things in but alas, nothing.
The store I'm going to order them from is interstate but they allow an exchange within 20 days. I'll probably end up ordering the 1540's and if my itch isn't quite scratched I'll do an exchange.... and if the T90's aren't worth it again I'll do a double exchange back to the 1540's (they've already said this is fine to do).
I guess the real question is..... Are the 1540's worth the money/a noteworthy upgrade from the 840's. From everything I've read the answer is yes... I mean even comfortwise they look WAY more comfortable going from the leathery style earpads to that softer material.
I never heard the 840s, so can't comment. However, I bought the HD600s when they were still $300 and the DT990s when they were $220. I had reservations about paying that much for headphones, even before they jumped in price to $400 and $380, respectively. I bought the 1540 at full $500 retail. Absolutely no regrets or remorse. Worth every penny to me.
FenixSyd
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
I never heard the 840s, so can't comment. However, I bought the HD600s when they were still $300 and the DT990s when they were $220. I had reservations about paying that much for headphones, even before they jumped in price to $400 and $380, respectively. I bought the 1540 at full $500 retail. Absolutely no regrets or remorse. Worth every penny to me.
Awesome man, sounds inspiring.
Normally I would scoff at open headphones because it just doesn't suit my listening needs, but now that I've been tossing up the decision I keep thinking "opens theoretically sound better, go with those". Arrrrrgh, just going to order the 1540's and stay ignorant to opens. If they arrive and sound amazing and deliver everything I expect then I'm not really losing anything. I like everything Shure related and everyone seems to be saying the 1540's are a winner so it's a no brainer at this point.
... I say this but I'm sure I'll flip flop my decision 15 times in the next 3 hours haha.
hodgjy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Posts
- 4,304
- Likes
- 1,221
The 1540 sound very open as far as closed cans go. You won't mistake them for open, but they're not congested at all.
FenixSyd
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
The 1540 sound very open as far as closed cans go. You won't mistake them for open, but they're not congested at all.
Yeah like the biggest appeal about the opens is soundstage. I'm not sure what your experience is like with opens but would you say the 1540's are more than fine for soundstage?
Byrnie
Headphoneus Supremus
I never heard the 840s, so can't comment. However, I bought the HD600s when they were still $300 and the DT990s when they were $220. I had reservations about paying that much for headphones, even before they jumped in price to $400 and $380, respectively. I bought the 1540 at full $500 retail. Absolutely no regrets or remorse. Worth every penny to me.
I have zero regrets about buying mine also.
hodgjy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Posts
- 4,304
- Likes
- 1,221
Yeah like the biggest appeal about the opens is soundstage. I'm not sure what your experience is like with opens but would you say the 1540's are more than fine for soundstage?
Not as wide as my HD600 or DT990, but more integrated. The HD600 and DT990 have somewhat of the "three blob" image (front, right ear, left ear), but the 1540 seems to be more coherent, even if it is not as wide.
The 1540 have plenty of soundstage. They're closed, so no getting around that. But they're not cramped or congested.
Byrnie
Headphoneus Supremus
Yeah like the biggest appeal about the opens is soundstage. I'm not sure what your experience is like with opens but would you say the 1540's are more than fine for soundstage?
I find them quite good for soundstage especially for a closed headphone. In fact, i have been considering sealing my hd650s since i got the 1540s (I sold my DT880s and D2000 too because i enjoyed my 1540s so much).
kimvictor
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2012
- Posts
- 4,397
- Likes
- 233
I'm kind of contradicting my neutral-ish nature, but I think I might like 1540 even more if it was more colored. Now that I'm used to colored iems like MDR7550 and IM03, 1540 sounds bit polite. Now, don't get me wrong. I still love SRH1540, and think that they have awesome SQ. It's just that if it's too neutral, it has no merits for me, as UERM does that perfectly. But if you are looking for slightly colored hp, SRH1540 is a great choice.
Also, I'm getting a carat topaz amp, so let's see how that pairs with the 1540.
Also, I'm getting a carat topaz amp, so let's see how that pairs with the 1540.
dakanao
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Posts
- 3,110
- Likes
- 440
Which was my point about the 1540 being more technically refined. If one likes the 840, and would like some more bass and a wider soundstage... which in result leads to smoother treble... then the 1540 is the perfect choice for an upgrade.
It improves on that Shure sound of the 840... without being completely different.
I thought the 840's treble and midrange quantity was perfection dude...
sofastreamer
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Posts
- 2,090
- Likes
- 813
Not as wide as my HD600 or DT990, but more integrated. The HD600 and DT990 have somewhat of the "three blob" image (front, right ear, left ear), but the 1540 seems to be more coherent, even if it is not as wide.
The 1540 have plenty of soundstage. They're closed, so no getting around that. But they're not cramped or congested.
soundstage and 3d Imaging is awesome, but sometimes it sounds a Little wierd and tubular. they Portrait a room, but at the same time Sound closed in. srh940 for example has similar 3d Imaging but sounds much more open.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)