[goldfilm]

Is the new SE Shure line better than the old EC?

 

[ClieOS]

FYI (because the title seem to be a bit confusing):
E2c -> SE110
E3c -> SE210
E4c -> SE310
E5c -> SE420
E500 -> SE530

 

[goldfilm]

Thanks Clie,

now, why most of the people still prefer the old line? Is it because they are cheaper, or because the new line doesn't offer great advantages?

 

[jws919]

I found the e3c more comfortable and better sounding than my se210. Just my thoughts. The se210 are far more durable, however.

 

[goldfilm]

Shure e4c $175 ; Shure SE310 $249. Is it worthy to pay around 40% more for a similar IEM, same brand?

 

[Pianist]

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldfilm /img/forum/go_quote.gif Shure e4c $175 ; Shure SE310 $249. Is it worthy to pay around 40% more for a similar IEM, same brand?

Those se310s are way overpriced. You can get a pair for around $150 on ebay, like here

Personally, I preferred Shure SE310 over Shure E4 in SQ. The SE310 just seemed a bit more fun to listen to. However, the difference is pretty small I believe. The same goes to Shure SE210 vs. E3 - they are both very similar sounding. On the other hand, I heard that the SE420 is a pretty significant improvement SQ wise over the E5 because of better quality crossover between the drivers. I have never heard SE420 though, only the E5 which I thought was a very good sounding IEM - better than UE Super.fi 5 Pro IMO.

 

[goldfilm]

Wow! That SE310 has a great price... I'm just concerned for a fake Shure on eBay. On the other hand, I trust Amazon 100%.

Another question about eBay purchases: if I need to replace the IEM under warranty, do I need to deal with the seller or with Shure directly?