Sorry maybe I'm being dense but what measurements? If you're on about maximum volume it seemed correct. If you want performance numbers it performs as standard AptX but with lower latency.
Once again these figures shouldn't really be trusted completely.
So the D10+BT entries, the devices are actually receiving a sample rate of 48KHz. The chain is as follows Windows 10 USB > Topping D10 > D10 Optical > BT transmitter > BT receiver.
(The optical to bluetooth transmitters I've tested seem to resample to 48KHz for transmission. Upsampling from 44.1KHz on these transmitters causes extra noise/errors.)
The Linux entries should have avoided any resampling with the following chain Linux > PulseAudio > BT Receiver.
(So everything is done software side and then sent using a standard USB bluetooth data dongle, no audio encoding is done by the bluetooth dongle.)
It's a shame I don't have a better recording device but rightmark has its limitations anyway. I did these tests mostly for curiosity on how well the cheap optical to bluetooth transmitters performed.
If it's the latency of AptX-LL you're interested in,
UP2 +28ms
H7 +26ms (Bang & Olufsen H7 do support AptX-LL)
(These latency results are how delayed the sound is compared to my wired headphones. The bluetooth result also varies a couple of ms.)
I hope this answers your question?
I was curious about difference apart from latency between Aptx HD and LL.
Yes, it does, thank you.