bigshot
Headphoneus Supremus
I was having a problem with a buzz in my system, which I suspected was from a xerox machine on the same power circuit on the other side of the wall. I spoke to a nice salesman who told me I needed a power conditioner. It was a power strip, but fancier, (monsterous in fact!) and it cost many many times as much as a home depot power strip. I bought it and took it back to my office. No change. I tweaked the grounding of my amp and equalizer. Poof! no more buzz, but I was stuck with a very pretty, but pointless power strip.
I've already done the Monster Cable comparison and I know the truth about that one. (The emporor has no clothes!) So you can understand my skepticism of any cabling changing the quality of the sound.
If there's a short, you hear crackling and cutting out. If you get radio interference, you get a buzz. These are all clear and unequivokable. Best of all, conceptually, you can completely wrap your head around *why* a new cable would get rid of the short or buzz. But when it comes to making an already good system sound better for some theoretical reason based on measurement numbers presented with no context... that's when I start suspecting someone is trying to fleece me.
Case in point... power cord. Why would a fancy power cord make any difference when the wiring in the walls uses standard code cord? If you can measure that the cord passes power along more efficiently, then compare the degree of efficiency against the normal fluctuation of power levels in the average wall jack. Are we talking grains of sand in a beach here? If you have a theory that you think might hold up, get a buddy to swap cords for you without you knowing which is which. I bet it's pretty tough to detect that coloration you were sure you heard before!
I recently saw a set of $300 wooden knobs on an audiophile site. The copy cited charts and diagrams to prove that knobs made of this particular type of Ash tree grown in Sweden or somewhere like that made volume pots sound cleaner. Yeah... right. Pull the other one.
There are SO MANY big factors that make sound lousy nowadays... engineering for the lowest common denominator, speaker systems designed to have no focus to the soundstage and to be so tiny sound is compromised, function sacrificed for form, digital meddling and overworking, poor mike placement, "giving the people what they want" with overboosted bass and treble, etc, etc, etc... it's a waste of time (and most of all money) to chase after minute factors.
The most convincing argument isn't "I can hear it and you can't." It's the argument that presents a problem that just about everyone can hear, explains how it works, and then presents a solution. Those are really useful discussions. Flowery talk about veils is at its best, really good fiction... add some charts and diagrams and it's Science Fiction!
See ya
Steve
I've already done the Monster Cable comparison and I know the truth about that one. (The emporor has no clothes!) So you can understand my skepticism of any cabling changing the quality of the sound.
If there's a short, you hear crackling and cutting out. If you get radio interference, you get a buzz. These are all clear and unequivokable. Best of all, conceptually, you can completely wrap your head around *why* a new cable would get rid of the short or buzz. But when it comes to making an already good system sound better for some theoretical reason based on measurement numbers presented with no context... that's when I start suspecting someone is trying to fleece me.
Case in point... power cord. Why would a fancy power cord make any difference when the wiring in the walls uses standard code cord? If you can measure that the cord passes power along more efficiently, then compare the degree of efficiency against the normal fluctuation of power levels in the average wall jack. Are we talking grains of sand in a beach here? If you have a theory that you think might hold up, get a buddy to swap cords for you without you knowing which is which. I bet it's pretty tough to detect that coloration you were sure you heard before!
I recently saw a set of $300 wooden knobs on an audiophile site. The copy cited charts and diagrams to prove that knobs made of this particular type of Ash tree grown in Sweden or somewhere like that made volume pots sound cleaner. Yeah... right. Pull the other one.
There are SO MANY big factors that make sound lousy nowadays... engineering for the lowest common denominator, speaker systems designed to have no focus to the soundstage and to be so tiny sound is compromised, function sacrificed for form, digital meddling and overworking, poor mike placement, "giving the people what they want" with overboosted bass and treble, etc, etc, etc... it's a waste of time (and most of all money) to chase after minute factors.
The most convincing argument isn't "I can hear it and you can't." It's the argument that presents a problem that just about everyone can hear, explains how it works, and then presents a solution. Those are really useful discussions. Flowery talk about veils is at its best, really good fiction... add some charts and diagrams and it's Science Fiction!
See ya
Steve