beowulf
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2001
- Posts
- 1,807
- Likes
- 496
Has anyone tried both? So far I am really not all that impressed with the Sennheiser MX 500, and am still looking for small earbuds to use at work...
Sorry MX500 fans... I admit these are excellent for the small amount of cash I left at the store... but even so, sound is lightyears behind of that would please me.
I'm not sure why I don't fall for the MX 500. Bass isn't bad, but to my ears, it seems that there is a lack of detail, I feel I am missing too much from the music. Maybe their are a bit darker than I'm used to. (Senn HD590/CD3000 fan). Also, I'd prefer a wider soudstage...
Since the Etymotic design probably won't be practical (I have to remove them often)... maybe the Sony E888 are a good choice?
I will be using them mostly in relatively quiet environments (at the office) and never outdoors, so maybe any added detail with the 888 might be worth the extra $$$.
So far, search engine magic gave me a few guidelines...
""The MX500s sound a little dark, more bass than the E888s, less midrange and a slightly tamer treble..." - ?
"At HIGH volume (8/10 on the D-E905) the E888s lose most of their bass definition,
the mids completely flood the mix, and there is sibilance galore, making this a
very unpleasant experience."
-Duncan
"I'll take the E888 any day of the week. It loses on price-performance, but it's
still worth every penny; we aren't talking R10 levels of cash here, anyway. I found
its sound more elegant, smooth, and refined than the MX500's. It loses on the low end,
but the sweet mids and glittering highs triumph."
"But for what it's worth, when I'm sitting around at home in the dead middle of the night,
2AM, and there isn't a peep in the world to disturb me, the 888s definitely trump the MX500s."
-Vertigo-1
"the 888 sounds more airy, transparent, detailed, things that just give it an edge over the MX500s
if you're looking to simply get the best earphones possible, money aside. In comparison the MX500s
had a slightly thicker midrange and a bit more of a boomy bass, and the treble detail wasn't as good.
Transparency particularly suffered compared to the 888s, I was just simply hearing more there in the
music with the 888s. <..> But despite this, I keep the MX500s in my backpack, and not the 888s. Why?
Because once I step out that door, the above becomes irrelevant. And I'd rather have my 10lbs books
smash the MX500s than smash my 888s. "
-Vertigo-1
"That aside... to my ears:
888: good midrange, poor bass, OK treble.
500: OK midrange, good bass, OK-to-good treble.
So the 500 come out slightly ahead in overall sound. Plus they cost $15 compared to $50-$60 for the 888.
So to me, it's a clear choice.
" - MacDEF
888:
Anyone else has tried both? Price doesn't count this time.. I'm looking for the best sound... Can the E888 kick Senn butt?
Sorry MX500 fans... I admit these are excellent for the small amount of cash I left at the store... but even so, sound is lightyears behind of that would please me.
I'm not sure why I don't fall for the MX 500. Bass isn't bad, but to my ears, it seems that there is a lack of detail, I feel I am missing too much from the music. Maybe their are a bit darker than I'm used to. (Senn HD590/CD3000 fan). Also, I'd prefer a wider soudstage...
Since the Etymotic design probably won't be practical (I have to remove them often)... maybe the Sony E888 are a good choice?
I will be using them mostly in relatively quiet environments (at the office) and never outdoors, so maybe any added detail with the 888 might be worth the extra $$$.
So far, search engine magic gave me a few guidelines...
""The MX500s sound a little dark, more bass than the E888s, less midrange and a slightly tamer treble..." - ?
"At HIGH volume (8/10 on the D-E905) the E888s lose most of their bass definition,
the mids completely flood the mix, and there is sibilance galore, making this a
very unpleasant experience."
-Duncan
"I'll take the E888 any day of the week. It loses on price-performance, but it's
still worth every penny; we aren't talking R10 levels of cash here, anyway. I found
its sound more elegant, smooth, and refined than the MX500's. It loses on the low end,
but the sweet mids and glittering highs triumph."
"But for what it's worth, when I'm sitting around at home in the dead middle of the night,
2AM, and there isn't a peep in the world to disturb me, the 888s definitely trump the MX500s."
-Vertigo-1
"the 888 sounds more airy, transparent, detailed, things that just give it an edge over the MX500s
if you're looking to simply get the best earphones possible, money aside. In comparison the MX500s
had a slightly thicker midrange and a bit more of a boomy bass, and the treble detail wasn't as good.
Transparency particularly suffered compared to the 888s, I was just simply hearing more there in the
music with the 888s. <..> But despite this, I keep the MX500s in my backpack, and not the 888s. Why?
Because once I step out that door, the above becomes irrelevant. And I'd rather have my 10lbs books
smash the MX500s than smash my 888s. "
-Vertigo-1
"That aside... to my ears:
888: good midrange, poor bass, OK treble.
500: OK midrange, good bass, OK-to-good treble.
So the 500 come out slightly ahead in overall sound. Plus they cost $15 compared to $50-$60 for the 888.
So to me, it's a clear choice.
" - MacDEF
888:

Anyone else has tried both? Price doesn't count this time.. I'm looking for the best sound... Can the E888 kick Senn butt?
