Quote:
When you can standardized the shape and density of peoples ears as well as EQ grey matter, come back to me. Otherwise, measurements are useful, but it's still better to listen to the darn things to see if you like them.
lol. no need to get upset at me for sayin it as i see it. sure, get what you like. personal preference for the win.
okay, there are slight variations in the size/shape of the outer ear, which is responsible for directing the sound waves into the ear canal. but once the sound waves hit your tympanic membrane, everyone's ears work the same. everyone has three ear bones. ear bones vibrate & sends signals through nerves & the brain processes/interprets it. sure, your brain may subjectively prefer one 'sound signature' over another, but that does not exclude the possibility of having specific sound signatures measured and characterized in an objective, accurate way.
even if you personally hear/perceive sound wave X 'differently' than me, sound wave X = sound wave X for you. sound wave X = sound wave X for me. sound wave X = sound wave X on the graph via any recording device. whether you like it or not is a different matter. it does not seem like a ridiculous idea that it is possible to accurately measure and describe sound through standardized graphs that accurately reflect what people will hear.
just think about it though. almost every other product industry is very reliant on actual specs to differentiate products (cars, tvs, cameras, phones, computers). you can apply your argument to eyes too, but there is definitely not this kind of conflicting/dissenting opinions or lack of some sort of objective performance measurement system about screens or TVs or cameras.
totally off-topic discussion and i am not trying to get into an argument. i just think that getting accurate, objective performance-based measurements non-reliant on a specific listener can be helpful to the headphones industry, and that kind of information can be a lot more helpful to a consumer than the personal ear test of a random person on the internet.
but of course, listening for yourself is the best. that's why I am saying that for head-fi-ers & audiophiles, a personal ear test is the golden standard. all other data = whatevs.