tumburu
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2012
- Posts
- 335
- Likes
- 52
Quote:
People will always do that kind of comparisons in certain limits. This comparisons make perfect sense especially for those that don't want to have a huge collection of headphones, but rather a couple of excellent all rounders.
In the past I was searching for an IEM to give me the level of detail that HD650 had. IE80 never made it, although I was naive enough to buy them based on what some fellows head-fiers write around here, who were praising them in that same context (comparison to 650). There's some general similarity in tone, but that's it, they are not anywhere near the level of detail hd650 provide. In fact they don't really provide detail, that's why you can enjoy pretty much any kind of music with them, be it poorly recorded or brilliantly mastered; everything will sound good (read veiled) on them.
But after I bought the k3003 and concluded (leaving aside the obvious differences coming from their different designs) that 3003 was superior in pretty much every way, I simply gave the 650 to a friend because they didn't gave me so much joy anymore. OTOH, I have to say, despite the old argument regarding how IEMs picture the stereo image compared to full sized/over ear/open headphones, I always found in-ears to render a more direct (in lack of a better word) bass. There's something that to me sounds really satisfying. I'm not saying it's natural or not, but it sounds "right" to me, and I'm not talking about "bass-enhancements" or bass heavy iems here. I'm talking about a sensation that only in-ears can provide.
So from the point where I stand I'd be surprised to hear that ie800 is not a more detailed and technical superior phone compared to hd650. Anyway, when Sennheiser made the press announcement and claimed that the new IEM will compete with full sized designs, I was sure they were talking about hd650, not about the 800.
I still don't understand the comparison between open back, large headphones and IEM's? They're always going to sound different, even from the same manufacturer. Apples & Oranges...
People will always do that kind of comparisons in certain limits. This comparisons make perfect sense especially for those that don't want to have a huge collection of headphones, but rather a couple of excellent all rounders.
In the past I was searching for an IEM to give me the level of detail that HD650 had. IE80 never made it, although I was naive enough to buy them based on what some fellows head-fiers write around here, who were praising them in that same context (comparison to 650). There's some general similarity in tone, but that's it, they are not anywhere near the level of detail hd650 provide. In fact they don't really provide detail, that's why you can enjoy pretty much any kind of music with them, be it poorly recorded or brilliantly mastered; everything will sound good (read veiled) on them.
But after I bought the k3003 and concluded (leaving aside the obvious differences coming from their different designs) that 3003 was superior in pretty much every way, I simply gave the 650 to a friend because they didn't gave me so much joy anymore. OTOH, I have to say, despite the old argument regarding how IEMs picture the stereo image compared to full sized/over ear/open headphones, I always found in-ears to render a more direct (in lack of a better word) bass. There's something that to me sounds really satisfying. I'm not saying it's natural or not, but it sounds "right" to me, and I'm not talking about "bass-enhancements" or bass heavy iems here. I'm talking about a sensation that only in-ears can provide.
So from the point where I stand I'd be surprised to hear that ie800 is not a more detailed and technical superior phone compared to hd650. Anyway, when Sennheiser made the press announcement and claimed that the new IEM will compete with full sized designs, I was sure they were talking about hd650, not about the 800.