Quote:
I've probably raised eyebrows when posting about my general preference for the HD650 over the LCD-2. The LCD-2 does have a level of clarity and realism the HD650 simply cannot replicate, but there's an incoherence to the way it images that rears its head at times. I do find the edge of the LCD-2 soundstage to be less constrained, but the issue for me is that instruments originate from within its large cups, with the musicians on top of you and in your personal space. To me the Senn's left and right audio queues more often seem to originate from outside the headspace, beyond the transducers. It's like being on a small well lit stage where everyone is packed in like sardines, versus a dark hazy one, where there's at least some elbow room.
This is an interest post. The T1 has the same presentation style as the HD650 (as you describe), and images really well, though I think this is in part due to it's treble peak. Similar to how the HE-6 and LCD-3 image better than the LCD-2, treble extension & presence have a strong impact on imaging (perhaps because treble is where the "air" lives?) -- just a correlation I've observed. Anyway, I recently went back and forth between the LCD-2 and T1 side-by-side. I found the T1's presentation to be exactly as you describe above, but the LCD-2 had a much
larger sonic wave, and as you say, it's less precise in it's "emanating point", but at the same time it makes for a very involving, non-HP like experience. I can't say I know which presentation style I prefer.