Back in the 70's, plugging an "audiophile clock" somewhere in the mains to improve all of your audio equipment was all the rage. Even Absolute Sound and Stereophile raved about it. When a brave buyer opened it up despite it will void the warranty, he found a $17.99 Radioshack LED clock in it. Suddenly everyone died down about the "tweak". I think it was sold at $300, in 1970 money. That's $1,882 in today's money.
And still today there are quantum pebbles, and tachyon generators, and fairy dust grounding boxes, each sold at exorbant prices promising audiophools that they will improve their gear. Buyers will swear on their mothers' graves that they can hear improvements from the expensive tweaks.
What I'm trying to say is, if it is bit perfect, its bit perfect. There's no reason for it to sound different. Unless the sound goes through some sort of compression before streaming through the net, or the software itself is affecting playback.
Or it could be the case like HDTrack where its a hit-and-miss situation because some 24/192 sounds like 16/44.1 and some tracks sound worse than their CD rips. Depending the files given by the record labels, some are better than the others. One case was they had posted a 24/176 version of Time Out by the Dave Brubeck Quartet and the track got several complaints because it sounded different so they had to request a replacement file from the record label.