OkPsychology
100+ Head-Fier
I see what you did thereTend to agree...Listening to some solo flute pieces and the presentation is rather brilliant (play on words)
I see what you did thereTend to agree...Listening to some solo flute pieces and the presentation is rather brilliant (play on words)
I am listening to TUTU Deluxe Edition from Miles Davies right now. The trumpet is sharp but not ear bleeding and those drums and the Ebass.... this can is really very capable.
Well I am a speaker kind of guy.....we'll see.
...headphone station at the back......
![]()
I´m really surprised because this, don't even know why, was the last headphone that I would think could be appropriate to my most listening music gender.
It has not been easy since the information is so subjective and scattered. I honestly came to realize that either I should go the Planar route (Empyrean for example), since I also enjoy some quality bass (no bass head tough) or concentrate on a few models like the Atrium or the Aeolus. Considering that being in Europe doesn't favor the ZMF route, for several reasons, the other "problem" is that I learnt recently that I don't appreciate much cans that start getting heavy. I believe above 400gr. is getting out of my comfort zone. I probably blame it being used to my super light Grados.
So, no easy decision, no "perfect" and obvious solution at this point. So you can imagine my expression when I read things like this. I have been following very closely this thread just because I was curious, since I tried very briefly, a few months ago, the 660S and also because I also follow the "other" thread about the polemical HP, concurrent to this one, also because I'm curious since I stumbled on it and couldn't believe, according to many, that a studio monitor could be that good for other purposes than not professional ones.
And they do, the leather pads affect the staging and IMHO not in a good way....took on the recent inspiration and listening to Miles' Tutu" the horizontal spread and depth where uncomfortably reduced and the overall tonal presentation has been altered. I may revisit the leather pads at some other time but currently for me they removed wharever makes the S2 a delight to listen to so back to the stock Sennheiser pads.Just received my perforated lambskin ear pads for the HD660S2...
Slighter thinner than stock which could affect staging.
![]()
Not at all. There's a difference between coming to an informed opinion about a headphone you are interested in, but don't yet have, by discussion and comparison with others to headphones you do have, and having preconceived notions. And yes, this comes about through actively trying to discuss! My point with mentioning what happened in the 660S thread was just that I realise that talking about a headphone that you don't have in order to form an opinion isn't something that everyone appreciates, but in the end in that thread quite a few people mentioned that it did stimulate good productive conversations about the 660S, and after I'd bought it I continued writing there giving detailed comparisons and impressions. At least I'm talking about the headphone and it's competitors and not amps and cables......I mean, if you're getting push back for doing the same thing in various threads then maybe chill a bit with it? It sounds like you prefer to go into things with preconceived notions, which is not "my style" at all, as you say, but you must see how this comes off to those of us actively trying to discuss. Your posts are all reading like you're developing your own narrative about a headphone, (which it seems like IS what you do?) and ignoring anything posted that doesn't follow that.
The 650 has a certain gooey thickness, and something magical in its tonality that is super seductive, and sounds incredible at times. I think the 660S2 has a bunch of that going on too, but also has technicalities that make it a better all arounder. Vocals sound a little better to me on the 650, but the S2's imaging, layering and separation leave the 650 for dead, I think. It really is a question of mood for me. I intend to keep both of them (at least for now). I also still love the original 660S which I always liked more than the 650 too. And all the aforementioned are better than the HD600 IMO.Was this 660S2 really the best technically and tonally in the 600 series? How far is HD650 behind it?
You mean is? : )Was this 660S2 really the best technically
Down to preferences.and tonally in the 600 series?
Posted earlier...660S driver (top) compared to 650...and the S2 is obviously even more finally tuned. Visually the more recent drivers look better made which IMHO and logically (hopefully) should translate into technically a more trouble free, cleaner and resolving performance....tranlates into less distortion. : )How far is HD650 behind it?
This is 660S:
And side by side with my old 650.
I feel the same, except I would re-buy it at $300. Are you going to try the other one?Returned my 660S2. Idk what it was but i kept getting headaches after using them that I don't get from 600/650 drivers. Increased magnetism maybe? It's weird the S2 has the same magnetism rating as the S1 but i never got headaches from using the S1.
I also felt like there was a trade off of stage depth imaging for naturalness and life-like timbre between 650/600 and S2. At the end of the day I think it will be a great headphone for some people, it's just not for me.
I had a headache/dizziness issue with early S1’s. But later ones I didn’t. No idea what caused it. Never happened with the HD 600/650. I am kinda worried to hear someone having the problem with the S2. I don’t think it’s the magnetism.Returned my 660S2. Idk what it was but i kept getting headaches after using them that I don't get from 600/650 drivers. Increased magnetism maybe? It's weird the S2 has the same magnetism rating as the S1 but i never got headaches from using the S1.
I also felt like there was a trade off of stage depth imaging for naturalness and life-like timbre between 650/600 and S2. At the end of the day I think it will be a great headphone for some people, it's just not for me.
I agree nothing related to magnetism. I am guessing it’s either fit-related or some reaction to the sound profile - it’s your body telling something ain’t right with the cansI had a headache/dizziness issue with early S1’s. But later ones I didn’t. No idea what caused it. Never happened with the HD 600/650. I am kinda worried to hear someone having the problem with the S2. I don’t think it’s the magnetism.
Yeah definitely not mangetism, I've spent plenty of time with headphones with stronger magnet systems and zero issues. The easier your ears can ease into the sound the better, that means it causes less aural fatigue in my experience. The headphones that cause me the least aural fatigue with long listening sessions tend to be my most used pairs.I agree nothing related to magnetism. I am guessing it’s either fit-related or some reaction to the sound profile - it’s your body telling something ain’t right with the cans![]()
I feel the same, except I would re-buy it at $300. Are you going to try the other one?