Mike Moffat and others here have posted they believe that Yggy's best results can been achieved though the AES/EBU input rather than the USB input. I've been extremely happy with my current desktop nearfield system: 16/44.1 balanced USB chain of Mac Mini (Pure Music or Roon)>Wyrd>Yggy>Ragnarock>KEF LS50/JLAudio e110. When I put the system together a few years ago, I had no way to input through AES/EBU to see for myself if there was any difference, but the sound was so awesome over USB that I didn't feel there was any reason to believe this needed improved upon.
Recently, I've read with interest the very positive reports from those experimenting with AOIP, but Dante/Rednet 3 setups were too big and too expensive for me to consider. I recently purchased a Dante/Atterotech UnDAES-O setup as a more reasonable option to see for myself if I could realize similar positive results from my own system.
After about an hour dicking around with the Dante controller/sound card, Pure Music, Roon, and Apple MIDI settings making sure each was optimized to maximum output quality, I was able to construct a Multi-Output Device that allowed me to play iTunes, Pure Music, or Roon and A/B test the USB versus AES/USB input to Yggy at equal output level using the input button on the Yggy to rapidly switch.
Going from AES/EBU to USB was easy requiring only one click of the button allowing near instantaneous A/B testing. USB to AES/EBU was a bit more difficult since it required 4 clicks to change the input, so there was about a 3 second delay to make the jump.
I started with Pure Music. For about 10 minutes, I played familiar tracks and clicked back and forth between the settings. I let the tracks run and would switch inputs every 10 seconds or so. I did not try to A/B the exact track segment because I didn't want any delay reselecting the segment potentially clouding my evaluation because I forgot what I had just listened to.
It was difficult for me to detect any major difference going back and forth regarding sound staging or general music quality. Both inputs sounded fabulous. For some reason I decided to close my eyes, drop my head, and sit perfectly still with my only movement being my finger pressing the input button to see if I could pick up a general gestalt of each input over 20 seconds or so.
And then I picked up on a noticeable difference. When set to AES/EBU, I felt I was in an extremely relaxed state, with low heart rate and nearly falling asleep. Switching to USB brought a near immediate "pressure" in my central head with increased heart rate and a much more agitated body awareness. Switching back to AES/EBU put me back in the prior relaxed state after about 5-10 seconds.
This was absolutely reproducible each time I switch inputs regardless of me using iTunes, Pure Music, or Roon as playback engine. But if I sat back and just listened for sound quality again, I really couldn't tell a major difference between the settings. I downloaded Audirvana to try to see if it gave me the same feeling, but I couldn't get it to work with the Multi-Output Device. It wanted me to set the MIDI input via a preference setting, so I couldn't do the near instantaneous switching I'd done previously.
With some more experimentation, I also found that I could tolerate louder levels without fatigue on AES/EBU than USB.
I'm a Physician in my day job, so I'm well aware of somatic findings, but I was shocked that I could FEEL a MAJOR difference in my music even though I couldn't HEAR a major difference. Maybe this is the "removal of layers of grime from the window pane" I've read reviewers talk about.
If reduction of listener fatigue and an improved sense of well being are the only byproducts of this change to my system, the less than $700 expenditure will have been well worth it. At this point, I'm an AOIP convert! I just wish I better understood the physics involved. Perhaps Mike's Manhattan project has something to do with this.
I'm interested if any others have experienced the same.
DSNORD