franzdom
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2006
- Posts
- 613
- Likes
- 114
This should be a nice step up from the Bifrost MB which I enjoy immensely. I will be pairing it for now with Lyr 2 and some very nice tubes.
Listening to the Jotunheim recently, I came to that same conclusion. Their new amplifier is so revealing of the source.
Yggdrasil is significantly different from Gugnir Multibit, when feeding into a resolving output path.
Is resolution the biggest difference?
That's what people have said was the biggest difference between them & otherwise they are nearly identical.
Listening to the Jotunheim recently, I came to that same conclusion. Their new amplifier is so revealing of the source.
Yggdrasil is significantly different from Gugnir Multibit, when feeding into a resolving output path.
Is resolution the biggest difference?
That's what people have said was the biggest difference between them & otherwise they are nearly identical.
With live-mic'd recordings the Yggy reveals the environment around the musicians better than any DAC I have experienced. This is the biggest difference for me.
It isn't just resolution – I've heard plenty of hyper-accurate DACs that provide razor-sharp trebles. Sheldaze's notion of 'weight' sounds right to me. The Yggy delivers resolution with exceptional clarity, and properly proportioned weight, if you will – linearity, I suppose.
I think it's their digital filter that's responsible for this magic. Anyone who has played with up-sampling knows the audible pitfalls one can encounter: loss of low-end, and overly-sharp and crunchy high end. I find it amazing to remember that the Yggy takes everything up to 352/384 kHz but the result is all upside.
Stay updated on Schiit Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
With live-mic'd recordings the Yggy reveals the environment around the musicians better than any DAC I have experienced. This is the biggest difference for me.
It isn't just resolution – I've heard plenty of hyper-accurate DACs that provide razor-sharp trebles. Sheldaze's notion of 'weight' sounds right to me. The Yggy delivers resolution with exceptional clarity, and properly proportioned weight, if you will – linearity, I suppose.
I think it's their digital filter that's responsible for this magic. Anyone who has played with up-sampling knows the audible pitfalls one can encounter: loss of low-end, and overly-sharp and crunchy high end. I find it amazing to remember that the Yggy takes everything up to 352/384 kHz but the result is all upside.
I am the owner of 2 Gungnir MB dacs working in 2 separate systems. I had heard that the Gungnir MB was 80 percent of the Yggdrasil so I thought I would spend the money in the hopes the upgrade would be worth it. I was able to find a good deal in Canada on a used Yggdrasil.
One word comes to mind upon replacing the Gungnir MB with the Yggdrasil are: WOW.
I was not expecting that much of a difference. I cant put a number on how much better the Yggdrasil is over the Gungnir MB but it is huge in my system. I can't be happier. It have made me take my system to a new level. All music sounds better not just red book.
Saving for a second one.
Speakers: Monitor Audio PL300
Preamp: Modwright ls36.5
Amps: Parasound A21 &A31
Receiver: Denon 4520
Bass is impressive and a couple of things have been flying around that I don't remember hearing before. Resolution is really good already. Tone seems to be improving throughout the day.
Treble is better tamed, this is definitely not fatiguing.
Also any hum I was getting from the Lyr 2 seems to be almost non-existant now.