[45longcolt]

?

Cannot. Unsee.

 

[Hofy]

?

How about all the parodies of the original in pic?

 

[audio philestine]

I just got it because being an audiophilistine

Welcome to the club! We're fortunate to have someone such as yourself!

 

[Roy G. Biv]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

 

[liamo]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

Wow!

 

[ArmchairPhilosopher]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

I gave up on reading it three paragraphs in. Horrid grammar is one thing, but the amount of factual errors just a few lines into the thing wasn’t worth forcing myself through the rest of it.
I’m assuming it’s not getting any better down the line…?

 

[liamo]

I gave up on reading it three paragraphs in. Horrid grammar is one thing, but the amount of factual errors just a few lines into the thing wasn’t worth forcing myself through the rest of it.
I’m assuming it’s not getting any better down the line…?

No, it isn’t. Like many things it’s a race to the bottom.

 

[golfbravobravo]

North Carolina must have windmills, right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_North_Carolina#:~:text=Wind power in North Carolina is found along the coastal,were found throughout the state.

Some guy on a donkey keeps trying to fight with them.....

 

[golfbravobravo]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

It looked to me like a machine written piece. It was absolutely awful......

 

[tafens]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

I tried to read it through, but my had to stop or my eyes would start to bleed and brain implode..

I gave up on reading it three paragraphs in. Horrid grammar is one thing, but the amount of factual errors just a few lines into the thing wasn’t worth forcing myself through the rest of it.
I’m assuming it’s not getting any better down the line…?

No.

I gave up on this paragraph:
”320 KBPS, moreover, uses only roughly 2.4 gigabytes per minute. In the case described above, a five-minute music would take up 12 Gigabytes, that is less than half the volume of lossless sound clips.”

 

[chronoso]

How about all the parodies of the original in pic?

There are so, so many:

 

[chronoso]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

"320 KBPS, moreover, uses only roughly 2.4 gigabytes per minute." Yikes, that's more than 4k60fps video!

 

[Zachik]

"320 KBPS, moreover, uses only roughly 2.4 gigabytes per minute." Yikes, that's more than 4k60fps video!

For high quality music - a price must be paid!

 

[ArmchairPhilosopher]

For high quality music - a price must be paid!

Yes. The price of having to wade through miles of knee-deep BS to find a few gems… ;p

Ironicaly (or not) the least amount of BS in this industry can be found at Schiit…

 

[RickB]

This may be the worst article on the subject that I've read to date - https://audiosolace.com/320-kbps-vs-lossless-audio/

That's a lot of damage.