OK, so how does the Pieter Wispelwey recording compare to the classic Janos Starkos Mercury recording? I guess we can keep things J. Gordon Holt simple: why do you prefer the performance you prefer, and what is outstanding about the recording you prefer? I like to listen to these to remind myself the range a cello is capable of.
I suppose, if you can't pick a favorite, you should still chime in and say which Schiit you prefer to listen to each version with.
I'm just one of the unwashed masses, and no expert, but here goes.
I started with the Pablo Casals version after remembering an NPR story comparing Robert Johnson's famous blues album to Casal's Cello suites (recorded at Abbey Road). Both were apparently recorded on the same day. Quite a day for music.
The Casals version is notable (I believe) for being the first to popularize the suites. I find it a bit sterile/clinical, but you have to respect the OG. Also a bit of a trip down memory lane with tape hiss.
The Yo-Yo Ma version I find to be much more emotional and expressive. Heck, I'm man enough to admit that in the right mood, it can (almost) make me cry.
I am not familiar with the Starkos version you mention.
I've got the Wispelwey version on order, so I haven't listened to anything other than some of the sound bites on the Amazon page. One of the amazon reviews says it is hushed and organic, with no vibrato, almost meditative, and close mic'd to the point of hearing his fingering/fretwork. From my sampling of the sound bites, I can see this.
FWIW, there's a Vox Earworm video I highly recommend, breaking down the Suite No. 1 Prelude ("that cello song")
As far as which schiit gear.... put a tube in their for the Cello. My favorite is the Bifrost (OG) multibit into a vali2/stock tube, but I'm sure others have better Schiit tubes for this.
EDIT: I had to go and find a copy of the Starker version now, too. You guys are a bad influence on me