aamefford
I have a custom title!
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Posts
- 3,914
- Likes
- 661
It's not bling (or not in a properly structured pricing regime), it's more component quality. Sure, you can get great sound with reasonably priced components and proper implementation, but you get better sound when component materials and fabrication are more optimized towards its function, precision, and/or reliability. And then it becomes an exponentially diminishing return, where each quantum level increase in component quality and price gets you successively less increase in sound quality.
The tipping point becomes how much you are willing or can afford to pay for that last little bit of attainable sonic bliss available to you. Such is the curse of audiophiles.
In a reasonable world, I agree. In the real world, my personal belief is that the aim is not necessarily always chasing those diminishing returns so much as it is using style, buzzwords, packaging and prose to separate the well heeled but insecure audiophile from his money. Sort of like the Ferrari side of the Corvette vs Ferrari argument. Wait. I just shot my whole point in the foot. I'll never own a Ferarri, but thanks to a fun afternoon sponsored by my lovely wife, I have driven a Ferarri. I completely get the Ferrari argument. Dang it.