JaZZ
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
After all you're not saying «...to color the sound in a pleasing way». Anyway, there's the implication that high-end players are tweaked to sound different than «normal players». Now, IME low(er)-priced players don't sound more uniform than high(er)-priced players: the differences within the categories are about equal. It's just that high-end players usually use better components, especially more linear (thus more expensive) converters, more sophisticated digital-filter algorithms (to take care of the CD format's weakest link: the antialiasing filter) and better analog sections. Which pays off in a more refined and often less «digital» sound.
BTW, cheap or expensive: the frequency response is more or less a straight line with digital players, except for a few exotic designs with «time-optimized» or without any high-pass filter (the resulting treble roll-off is the price to pay, not the original goal).
Sure, the differences among speakers and headphones are huge in comparison... But audio goumets also appreciate fine nuances, not just the obvious. Electronics' characteristics shine through sound-transducer characteristics if the latter are of high quality in terms of resolution, which doesn't exclude synergies, but you can't compensate for a mediocre source signal on sound-transducer level.
.
Originally Posted by bigshot /img/forum/go_quote.gif The differences between speakers are great. The differences between headphones are also significant. The differences between CD players is tiny in comparison. However, I don't doubt that there are high end players that have been deliberately tweaked to give a different response and a different sound. |
After all you're not saying «...to color the sound in a pleasing way». Anyway, there's the implication that high-end players are tweaked to sound different than «normal players». Now, IME low(er)-priced players don't sound more uniform than high(er)-priced players: the differences within the categories are about equal. It's just that high-end players usually use better components, especially more linear (thus more expensive) converters, more sophisticated digital-filter algorithms (to take care of the CD format's weakest link: the antialiasing filter) and better analog sections. Which pays off in a more refined and often less «digital» sound.
BTW, cheap or expensive: the frequency response is more or less a straight line with digital players, except for a few exotic designs with «time-optimized» or without any high-pass filter (the resulting treble roll-off is the price to pay, not the original goal).
Sure, the differences among speakers and headphones are huge in comparison... But audio goumets also appreciate fine nuances, not just the obvious. Electronics' characteristics shine through sound-transducer characteristics if the latter are of high quality in terms of resolution, which doesn't exclude synergies, but you can't compensate for a mediocre source signal on sound-transducer level.
.