I can't be more happy for the great review that Mr. Philips wrote about the SR-71. After I read it, I thought I would send him a note to clarify some info about the SR-71 & it's gain, before the review was getting published. But probably due to a very bussy schedual that he has I got no reply.
I listen load, sometimes, well ok, all the times, & if I am using the SR-71 with the high impedance headphones like HD600, which are my favorite, I find the volume control on the SR-71 to be around 2-3 O'Clock. Which really does not matter to the amp, as I am not pushing it beyond it's capability but trying to get more gain due to the gain of 6 that the SR-71 has as a stock amp, This gain works very well with in ear canal phones & does very well with Sennheisers. This gain of 6, sometimes, fools the listeners by thinking that the amp is running out of steam, or they are pushing it beyond of it's capability.
If I would have known that Mr. Philips would be listening very load with HD650 to find out if the amp is going to do it for him at those high levels of sound, I would have send the Stereophile Meg. a HIGH gain SR-71, this way the amp would drive the HD650 very load with out going beyound 12.00 O' clock.
I have all the respect to the other amp that the SR-71 was compared to, even though I have never heard it, but I am sure it did not have the gain of 6 niether it was desighned to be portable to be carried around.
Gain is a tricky feature, many fall for it, even if you listen to two amps through A/B switch if one is higher than the other by so little margin, our ears pick it up as a better amp.
I am not complaining over hear at all, as I can't be more than thankfull to the effort of both Mr. John Atkinson & Mr. Wes Philips, but at the same time wanted to kick my self in the rear end for not sending the higher gain amp.
Do I need a better review for the SR-71 than this, NO. Did I get good response out of this review, HELL, BIG YES.
Ray Samuels