RikudouGoku
Member of the Trade: RikuBuds
yes, I believe that longer reviews isnt that big of a con lol. Then the question is, which way gives more information?For me i don't mind longer content as long as they are informative and give more details about them so will help me to easier to imagine how the sound like based on comparison with others. Sometimes 1 IEM is so good but the bass is slow, while others maybe just a little bit less in technicalities but have better speed bettwr textured bass. I like more detailed reviews, particularly about sounds. Other than that, byild quality, accessories everything, picture tells thousand words.
The first one with the comparisons as I have done it like this: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/fiio-fh3.24543/reviews#item-review-24105
For example with this section (vs LZ A6): "Sub-bass extension is lower, faster and tighter on the A6 while the FH3 rumbles and has more texture but quantity is a bit lower on the A6."
With the version 2.0 it would be something like:
Bass: Djuro – Drop that bass (01:15-01:30), the FH3 rumbles more has more texture and sounds more natural/correct as a result of that, while the A6 is cleaner since it is faster and tighter (even when extension is lower).